首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Livelihood roles of cattle and prospects for alternative land uses at the wildlife/livestock interface in South Africa.
【24h】

Livelihood roles of cattle and prospects for alternative land uses at the wildlife/livestock interface in South Africa.

机译:南非野生动植物/牲畜交界处牲畜的生计角色和其他土地用途的前景。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The emergence of wildlife ranching as an alternative land use option to agriculture, in Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs), has cast renewed interest on the role of cattle farming in rural livelihoods in areas close to wildlife parks. This study analysed the contribution of cattle to livelihoods and relationships between cattle and potential wildlife land uses in rural areas near Kruger National Park. Data were collected through household surveys, key informant interviews and community workshops. About 11% of households studied owned cattle, and cattle income constituted 29% of total household income. Benefits from cattle were also derived by households without cattle. About 71% of households had at least three sources of income, reflecting diversity of livelihoods. Wildlife related land uses were perceived by some households as threatening cattle production, whilst others viewed them as opportunities for alternative livelihoods. We conclude that cattle production has important livelihood roles, but is not sufficient as a driver of economic development in these areas. Incentives to encourage diversification of livelihoods at the wildlife/livestock interface, with possibilities for rural communities to explore wildlife based land uses should be put in place. In addition, land use policy and planning in such areas should focus on creating institutional mechanisms through which programmes integrating conservation and rural development goals can benefit rural communities.
机译:在跨境保护区(TFCA)中,野生动植物牧场作为农业替代土地使用方式的出现,引起了人们对在野生动植物公园附近的农村生计中养牛业的作用重新引起关注。这项研究分析了牛对生计的贡献以及牛与克鲁格国家公园附近农村地区的潜在野生动植物土地利用之间的关系。通过家庭调查,主要知情人访谈和社区研讨会收集了数据。约有11%的家庭拥有牛,牛的收入占家庭总收入的29%。没有养牛的家庭也从养牛中受益。大约71%的家庭至少拥有三种收入来源,这反映了生计的多样性。一些家庭将与野生生物有关的土地利用视为威胁牛的生产,而另一些家庭则将其视为替代生计的机会。我们得出的结论是,牲畜生产具有重要的生计作用,但不足以推动这些地区的经济发展。应制定激励措施,鼓励野生动植物/牲畜交界处的生计多样化,并为农村社区探索基于野生动植物的土地利用提供可能性。此外,这些地区的土地使用政策和规划应着重于建立体制机制,通过该机制,将保护与农村发展目标相结合的方案可使农村社区受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号