...
首页> 外文期刊>Noise Control Engineering Journal >TECHNICAL NOTE - EVALUATION OF A RE-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RESULTS OBTAINED IN LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDIES ON THE ANNOYANCE CAUSED BY HIGH-ENERGY IMPULSIVE SOUNDS
【24h】

TECHNICAL NOTE - EVALUATION OF A RE-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RESULTS OBTAINED IN LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDIES ON THE ANNOYANCE CAUSED BY HIGH-ENERGY IMPULSIVE SOUNDS

机译:实验室中获得的结果与现场研究高能脉冲声引起的烦恼之间关系的重新分析的技术注释评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1994, Schemer [Noise Control Eng. J. 42(5), 179-191 (3.994)] showed that the annoyance caused by high-energy impulsive sound increases more rapidly with sound level than does the annoyance caused by vehicle passby sound, and he proposed a new method for assessment of this impulsive sound, The National Research Council (NRC) has reported on the assessment of high-energy impulsive sound, and it has included the method proposed by Schemer as one of two recommended methods, This method has been incorporated into a new American National Standard, The method is based primarily on field-laboratory studies, and it uses a non-constant adjustment that is made to the sound exposure level (SEL), not to the equivalent level, Because this new method represented quite a departure from traditional practice, many sources of relevant data in addition to the field-laboratory data were examined, These sources included an approximate re-analysis of old attitudinal survey data from Ft, Bragg and Ft, Lewis for which the original operational data were lost. The purpose in using these approximate attitudinal survey data was to show that a non-constant adjustment to SEL also was plausible on the basis of just those attitudinal survey data, Vos has used these approximate attitudinal survey data as absolute and has developed a revised means to relate blast sounds to equivalently annoying wheeled vehicle sounds, This paper examines the analysis by Vos [Noise Control Eng, J. 45(3), 123-131 (1997)] and provides alternative interpretations to his analysis, It shows that Vos's analysis inappropriately treats approximate data as exact and absolute, Further, Vos's analysis uses populations where the percent highly annoyed is very small and hence, less stable, and it ignores some of the attitudinal survey data. (C) 1997 Institute of Noise Control Engineering. [References: 12]
机译:在1994年,计划者[噪声控制工程。 J. 42(5),179-191(3.994)]表明,高能脉冲声引起的烦恼随声级的增加比车辆旁通声音引起的烦扰要快,他提出了一种新的方法来评估噪声。美国国家研究委员会(NRC)报告了这种高能脉冲声的评估方法,并已将Schemer提出的方法作为推荐的两种方法之一,该方法已被纳入新的美国国家标准中,该方法主要基于现场实验室研究,并且使用了对声音暴露水平(SEL)(而不是等效水平)的非恒定调整,因为这种新方法与传统做法完全不同,除了实地实验室数据外,还检查了许多相关数据源。这些数据源包括对Ft,Bragg和Ft,Lewis的原始态度调查数据的近似重新分析,其原始操作数据丢失。使用这些近似态度调查数据的目的是表明,仅基于这些态度调查数据,对SEL的非恒定调整也是合理的,Vos使用这些近似态度调查数据作为绝对值,并开发了一种修正方法来将爆炸声与同样令人讨厌的轮式车辆声音关联起来,本文研究了Vos的分析[Noise Control Eng,J. 45(3),123-131(1997)],并提供了他的分析的替代解释,它表明Vos的分析不合适Vos的分析使用的人群中,被高度困扰的百分比很小,因此不稳定,因此忽略了一些态度调查数据。 (C)1997噪声控制工程研究所。 [参考:12]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号