...
首页> 外文期刊>Langenbeck's archives of surgery >Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene(R) LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE(R) INFINIT(R) mesh)--Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model.
【24h】

Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene(R) LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE(R) INFINIT(R) mesh)--Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model.

机译:轻质聚丙烯网(Optilene®LP)和大孔针织PTFE网(GORE®INFINIT®网)的比较-在标准内窥镜腹膜疝气模型中的生物相容性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The use of a mesh with good biocompatibility properties is of decisive importance for the avoidance of recurrences and chronic pain in endoscopic hernia repair surgery. As we know from numerous experiments and clinical experience, large-pore, lightweight polypropylene meshes possess the best biocompatibility. However, large-pore meshes of different polymers may be used as well and might be an alternative solution. METHODS: Utilizing a totally extraperitoneal technique in an established animal model, 20 domestic pigs were implanted with either a lightweight large-pore polypropylene (PP) mesh (Optilene(R) LP) or a medium-weight large-pore knitted polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) mesh (GORE(R) INFINIT(R) mesh). After 94 days, the pigs were sacrificed and postmortem diagnostic laparoscopy was performed, followed by explantation of the specimens for macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. RESULTS: The mean mesh shrinkage rate was 14.2% for Optilene(R) LP vs. 24.7% for INFINIT(R) mesh (p = 0.017). The partial volume of the inflammatory cells was 11.2% for Optilene(R) LP vs. 13.9% for INFINIT (n.s.). CD68 was significantly higher for INFINIT (11.8% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.007). The markers of cell turnover, namely Ki67 and the apoptotic index, were comparable at 6.4% vs. 12.4% (n.s.) and 1.6% vs. 2.0% (n.s.). In the extracellular matrix, TGF-beta was 35.4% for Optilene(R) LP and 31.0% for INFINIT(R) (n.s.). Collagen I (pos/300 mum) deposits were 117.8 and 114.9, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our experimental examinations, Optilene(R) LP and INFINIT(R) showed a comparable biocompatibility in terms of chronic inflammatory reaction; however, the shrinkage rate was significantly higher for INFINIT(R) after 3 months. The higher shrinkage rate of INFINIT(R) should be taken into account when choosing the mesh size for an adequate hernia overlap.
机译:目的:使用具有良好生物相容性的网片对于避免内镜疝修补术的复发和慢性疼痛具有决定性的重要性。从众多实验和临床经验中我们知道,大孔,轻质的聚丙烯网具有最佳的生物相容性。但是,也可以使用不同聚合物的大孔网眼,并且可以作为替代解决方案。方法:在已建立的动物模型中采用完全腹膜外技术,将20头家猪植入轻型大孔聚丙烯(PP)网格(Optilene(R)LP)或中型大孔针织聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)网格(GORE INFINIT网格)。 94天后,处死猪并进行死后诊断性腹腔镜检查,然后移出标本进行肉眼观察,组织学和免疫组织化学评估。结果:Optilene LP的平均网眼收缩率为14.2%,而INFINIT®网眼的平均网眼收缩率为24.7%(p = 0.017)。 Optilene LP的炎性细胞部分体积为11.2%,而INFINIT(n.s.)为13.9%。 INFINIT的CD68明显更高(11.8%比5.6%,p = 0.007)。细胞更新的标志物,即Ki67和凋亡指数,可比为6.4%对12.4%(n.s。)和1.6%对2.0%(n.s。)。在细胞外基质中,LP的TGF-β为35.4%,INFINIT的TGF-β为31.0%(n.s。)。 I型胶原蛋白(pos / 300妈妈)的沉积分别为117.8和114.9。结论:在我们的实验检查中,就慢性炎症反应而言,Optilene LP和INFINIT表现出相当的生物相容性。但是,3个月后INFINIT(R)的收缩率明显更高。选择足够的疝重叠网尺寸时,应考虑较高的收缩率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号