...
首页> 外文期刊>Lancet Neurology >Subthalamic versus globus pallidus deep brain stimulation: Authors' reply.
【24h】

Subthalamic versus globus pallidus deep brain stimulation: Authors' reply.

机译:丘脑下与苍白球深部脑刺激:作者的回复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Netherlands SubThalamic and Pallidal Stimulation (NSTAPS) study was initiated to test the hypothesis that bilateral globus pallidus deep brain stimulation would improve disability to a greater extent than would bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. By contrast with previous studies that investigated the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation, we chose a generic disability scale as the primary outcome measure, which was weighted by time spent in either the on phase or the off phase. Our results did not show a between-group difference for this primary outcome. As stipulated in our discussion section and in line with Erwin Montgomery's remarks, this result could be explained by insufficient statistical power raising the probability of a type II error. We are of course aware that the absence of difference in our primary outcome does not imply equivalence of the two procedures. However, this idea was not our conclusion, nor was it the rationale of the accompanying Comment.
机译:发起荷兰下丘脑和苍白球刺激试验(NSTAPS)来检验以下假设:双侧苍白球深部脑刺激比双侧丘脑底深部脑刺激能够更大程度地改善残疾。与先前研究深部脑电刺激效果的研究相比,我们选择了通用的残疾量表作为主要结局指标,该指标由在开或关阶段花费的时间加权。我们的结果并未显示出该主要结果的组间差异。正如我们的讨论部分所述,并与Erwin Montgomery的评论一致,此结果可以用统计能力不足来解释,从而增加II型错误的可能性。我们当然知道,我们的主要结果没有差异并不意味着这两个程序是等效的。但是,这个想法不是我们的结论,也不是所附评论的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号