首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Two-year outcomes after deployment of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: A report from the SPIRIT V single arm study
【24h】

Two-year outcomes after deployment of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: A report from the SPIRIT V single arm study

机译:XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗的患者中部署后的两年结局:SPIRIT V单臂研究的报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this analysis was to analyze outcomes of patients undergoing Xience V EES treatment of bifurcation lesions, a subset in which treatment is particularly challenging. The SPIRIT V Study provided an evaluation of the Xience V everolimus eluting stent (EES) performance in complex patient and lesion population. The SPIRIT V Single Arm Study enrolled 2700 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions suitable to be optimally treated with a maximum of four planned Xience V EES. Lesion evaluation was by visual assessment. The outcomes of the 492 patients undergoing Xience V EES stenting of 1 bifurcation lesion were compared to those with no bifurcation lesion treated. Compared to those without bifurcation treatment, patients with bifurcation treatment were more likely to have multi-vessel disease (49% vs 40%), left main treatment (3.1% vs 0.9%), more lesions treated (1.5 vs 1.3), calcification (36.4% vs 27.5%), and ostial (17.1% vs 8.2%) and angulated lesions (29.3% vs 21.1%), all P<0.001. The 30-day composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 4.3% in patients with bifurcation PCI and 2.2% in those with non-bifurcation PCI (P=0.017). At 2 years, this composite event rate was 11.3% and 10.0% in these two groups, respectively (P=0.403). Rates of cardiac death, MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR, and ARC defined definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 0.9%, P=0.402) were not significantly different between the two groups. Despite greater patient and lesion complexity, treatment of patients with bifurcation lesions using the Xience V EES in the SPIRIT V prospective Single Arm Study was safe and effective, with low overall event rates that were similar to those without bifurcation lesion treatment. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:该分析的目的是分析接受Xience V EES治疗分叉病变的患者的结局,分叉病变是治疗中特别具有挑战性的一个子集。 SPIRIT V研究评估了Xience V依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)在复杂患者和病变人群中的表现。 SPIRIT V单臂研究招募了2700例初发冠状动脉病变的患者,这些患者适合采用最多四个计划的Xience V EES进行最佳治疗。通过视觉评估病变。将492位接受Xience V EES支架置入1个分叉病变的患者与未接受分叉病变的患者的结果进行比较。与不进行分叉治疗的患者相比,接受分叉治疗的患者更有可能患有多支血管疾病(49%vs 40%),左主治疗(3.1%vs 0.9%),更多的病变得到治疗(1.5 vs 1.3),钙化( 36.4%vs. 27.5%),口腔(17.1%vs. 8.2%)和角状病变(29.3%vs 21.1%),所有P <0.001。分叉PCI患者的30天综合死亡率,心肌梗塞(MI),靶血管血运重建(TVR)分别为4.3%和非分叉PCI患者的2.2%(P = 0.017)。在2年时,两组的复合事件发生率分别为11.3%和10.0%(P = 0.403)。两组的心源性死亡,心梗,靶病变血运重建(TLR),TVR和ARC定义的明确或可能的支架血栓形成率(0.4%vs 0.9%,P = 0.402)没有显着差异。尽管患者和病变的复杂性更高,但使用SPIRIT V前瞻性单臂研究中的Xience V EES治疗具有分叉病变的患者是安全有效的,总事件发生率较低,与未进行分叉病变的患者相似。 (c)2013 Wiley期刊公司

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号