首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >A new intracoronary measurement catheter, MetriCath, compared to intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography in a stented porcine coronary model.
【24h】

A new intracoronary measurement catheter, MetriCath, compared to intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography in a stented porcine coronary model.

机译:在带支架的猪冠状动脉模型中,与冠脉内超声和定量冠状动脉造影相比,新型冠状动脉内测量导管MetriCath具有优势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare measurements by MetriCath to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The MetriCath system consists of a low-pressure (200 mm Hg) balloon catheter connected to a pressure transducer and infusion pump linked to a computer that records pressure-volume curves. Cross-sectional area of blood vessels is obtained directly from the unrestrained and in-stent pressure-volume measurements. We compared stent cross-sectional area measurements by MetriCath, IVUS, and QCA in a porcine stented coronary artery model. Comparison of area measurements in 14 stents showed no significant differences between the three methods (P = 0.66). On average, values differed 0.37 +/- 0.60 mm(2) between MetriCath and QCA, 0.13 +/- 0.55 mm(2) between MetriCath and IVUS, and 0.22 +/- 0.80 mm(2) between IVUS and QCA. This corresponds to 6.2% +/- 10%, 3.0% +/- 9.0%, and 3.1% +/- 12.9% relative difference from the average of two corresponding measurements. Linear regression analysis showed excellent correlation between measurements (r = 0.99 for all comparisons). The differences in in-stent area measurements between MetriCath and both QCA and IVUS were small. Considering the ease and rapidity of obtaining MetriCath results, this technique may form an alternative to the others in evaluating stent expansion. Based on these findings, clinical evaluation seems warranted. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:2-9.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较MetriCath与血管内超声(IVUS)和定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)的测量结果。 MetriCath系统由连接至压力传感器的低压(200 mm Hg)球囊导管和与记录压力-体积曲线的计算机相连的输液泵组成。血管的横截面积直接从不受约束的和支架内的压力体积测量值获得。我们比较了由MetriCath,IVUS和QCA在猪支架冠状动脉模型中测量支架的横截面积。比较14种支架的面积测量结果表明,三种方法之间没有显着差异(P = 0.66)。平均而言,MetriCath和QCA之间的值相差0.37 +/- 0.60 mm(2),MetriCath和IVUS之间的值相差0.13 +/- 0.55 mm(2),IVUS和QCA之间的值相差0.22 +/- 0.80 mm(2)。与两次相应测量的平均值相比,这相当于6.2%+/- 10%,3.0%+/- 9.0%和3.1%+/- 12.9%的相对差异。线性回归分析显示测量之间的极好的相关性(所有比较的r = 0.99)。 MetriCath与QCA和IVUS之间的支架内面积测量值差异很小。考虑到获得MetriCath结果的简便性和快速性,在评估支架扩展时,该技术可能形成其他技术。基于这些发现,似乎有必要进行临床评估。 Cathet心血管介入2002; 57:2-9。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号