...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Research >Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion
【24h】

Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion

机译:两种测定尿中蔗糖和果糖排泄量的分析方法的比较和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urinary sugars excretion has been proposed as a potential biomarker for intake of sugars. In this study, we compared 2 analytical methods (gas chromatography [GC] and enzymatic reactions-UV absorption) for quantifying urinary fructose and sucrose using 24-hour urine samples from a randomized crossover controlled feeding study. All samples were successfully quantified by the GC method; however, 21% and 1.9% of samples were below the detection limit of the enzymatic method for sucrose and fructose, respectively. Although the correlation between the 2 methods was good for fructose (Pearson correlation, 0.71), the correlation was weak for sucrose (Pearson correlation, 0.27). We favor the GC method because of its better sensitivity, simplicity, and the ability to quantify fructose and sucrose directly in the same run. Of the 106 samples from 53 participants with complete urine collection after 2 study diets, 24-hour urinary fructose excretion was significantly associated with fructose intake. The sum of 24-hour urinary fructose and sucrose was significantly associated with total sugars consumption. However, variation in intakes of sugars explained only a modest amount of variation in urinary sugars excretion. In the unadjusted models, fructose intake explained 24.3% of urinary fructose excretion, and intake of total sugars explained 16.3% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. The adjusted models explained 44.3% of urinary fructose excretion and 41.7% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. Therefore, we caution using these biomarkers to predict sugars consumption before other factors that determine urinary sugars excretion are understood
机译:尿糖排泄已被提议作为糖摄入的潜在生物标记。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种分析方法(气相色谱[GC]和酶促反应-紫外吸收),使用来自随机交叉控制喂养研究的24小时尿液样品定量尿果糖和蔗糖。所有样品均通过GC方法成功定量;但是,分别有21%和1.9%的样品低于酶法测定的蔗糖和果糖的检出限。尽管两种方法之间的相关性对于果糖是好的(Pearson相关性,0.71),但是对于蔗糖,相关性较弱(Pearson相关性,0.27)。我们喜欢GC方法,因为它具有更好的灵敏度,简便性,并且能够在同一运行中直接定量果糖和蔗糖。在接受2种研究饮食后从53名参与者中收集了全部尿液的106个样本中,24小时尿果糖排泄与果糖摄入量显着相关。 24小时尿果糖和蔗糖的总和与糖的总消耗量显着相关。但是,糖摄入量的变化仅说明了尿糖排泄量的适度变化。在未经调整的模型中,果糖摄入占尿果糖排泄的24.3%,总糖摄入占尿果糖和蔗糖总和的16.3%。调整后的模型解释了尿果糖排泄的44.3%和尿果糖与蔗糖总和的41.7%。因此,在了解决定尿糖排泄的其他因素之前,我们谨慎使用这些生物标记物来预测糖的消耗

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号