首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >A reply to 'Scepticism about the virtue ethics approach to nursing ethics' by Stephen Holland: The relevance of virtue in nursing ethics
【24h】

A reply to 'Scepticism about the virtue ethics approach to nursing ethics' by Stephen Holland: The relevance of virtue in nursing ethics

机译:斯蒂芬·霍兰德(Stephen Holland)对“关于美德伦理学对护理伦理学的怀疑论”的答复:美德在护理伦理学中的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Stephen Holland (2010) raises several points against the value of virtue ethics in professional nursing. The heart of his argument is that the professional ethics of nursing is not an arena in which virtue ethics is useful. While he admits that virtue ethics is useful in personal life, the parameters of nursing as a distinct profession call for other normative theories. Action-related or rule-related ethical systems fit much more easily into the code of ethics used by the nursing profession. I find Holland's arguments to be specious and this paper will spell out my objections. Not only is virtue ethics useful for nurses, but it is a central theory for distinguishing the consistently effective nurse from his or her counterparts.
机译:斯蒂芬·霍兰德(Stephen Holland,2010)反对在职业护理中美德伦理学的价值。他的论点的核心是,护理职业道德不是美德伦理有用的领域。尽管他承认美德伦理在个人生活中是有用的,但作为一项独特职业的护理参数要求其他规范理论。与行动相关或与规则相关的道德体系更容易融入护理行业使用的道德规范中。我发现霍兰德的论点似是而非,本文将阐明我的反对意见。美德伦理不仅对护士有用,而且是区分始终有效的护士与同伴的中心理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号