...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparison of the self-expanding Radius stent and the balloon-expandable Multilink stent for elective treatment of coronary stenoses: a serial analysis by intravascular ultrasound.
【24h】

Comparison of the self-expanding Radius stent and the balloon-expandable Multilink stent for elective treatment of coronary stenoses: a serial analysis by intravascular ultrasound.

机译:自扩张式Radius支架与球囊扩张式Multilink支架用于选择性治疗冠状动脉狭窄的比较:通过血管内超声进行的系列分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the outcome of the self-expanding Radius stent and the balloon-expandable Multilink stent serially by angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Successful stent deployment was achieved in 66 lesions of 56 stable angina patients (34 lesions with Radius stents and 32 lesions with Multilink stents). At follow-up, there were no significant differences in minimal lumen diameter or percent diameter stenosis between the groups, nor in restenosis rates, although the Radius stent group rate was slightly lower (23.5% vs. 31.3%). In the Radius stent group, stent cross-sectional area (CSA) increased gradually after implantation until the 6-month follow-up (8.37 +/- 1.83 to 10.16 +/- 2.59 mm(2); n = 15), giving a larger CSA (P = 0.03) than the Multilink stent group, which decreased (9.00 +/- 2.05 to 8.27 +/- 2.15 mm(2); n = 17). The lumen CSA was also slightly larger (6.82 +/- 3.06 vs. 5.84 +/- 1.85 mm(2); P = 0.29) in the Radius stent group. These findings indicated that the Radius stent enlarged progressively after implantation, which might be useful for prevention of restenosis.
机译:我们通过血管造影和血管内超声依次比较了自扩张式Radius支架和球囊扩张式Multilink支架的结果。在56例稳定型心绞痛患者的66个病变中成功部署了支架(使用Radius支架的34个病变和使用Multilink支架的32个病变)。随访时,两组之间的最小管腔直径或狭窄百分比百分比以及再狭窄率均无显着差异,尽管Radius支架组的比率略低(23.5%比31.3%)。在Radius支架组中,植入后支架的横截面积(CSA)逐渐增加,直到进行6个月的随访(8.37 +/- 1.83至10.16 +/- 2.59 mm(2); n = 15), CSA(P = 0.03)大于Multilink支架组,后者降低了(9.00 +/- 2.05至8.27 +/- 2.15 mm(2); n = 17)。在Radius支架组中,管腔CSA也略大(6.82 +/- 3.06 vs.5.84 +/- 1.85 mm(2); P = 0.29)。这些发现表明,Radius支架植入后逐渐扩大,这对于预防再狭窄可能有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号