...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >New methods for registering long-time I-123 ADAM SPECT image sequences to magnetic resonance images.
【24h】

New methods for registering long-time I-123 ADAM SPECT image sequences to magnetic resonance images.

机译:将长时间I-123 ADAM SPECT图像序列注册到磁共振图像的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: I-123 ADAM single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) analysis is usually performed by drawing regions of interest or by directly registering the SPECT image to a magnetic resonance image (MRI). Each method is limited by an observer or registration bias. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers were recruited for I-123 ADAM SPECT using a triple-headed gamma camera with fan-beam collimators after an intravenous injection of 185 MBq of I-123 ADAM. We propose two new registration methods: sequential registration and a two-step registration. Reconstructed images were registered to MRIs using mutual information with sequential and two-step methods. RESULTS: The sequential and two-step method mean counts of midbrain activity were not significantly different (166.1+/-4.3 vs. 164.2+/-4.1, P=0.273), but they were significantly higher than the direct method mean count (132.8+/-3.7, P<0.001). Sequential and two-step method midbrain/cerebellum ratios were not significantly different (4.40+/-0.37 vs. 4.28+/-0.34, P=0.277), but they were significantly higher than the direct method midbrain/cerebellum ratio (1.68+/-0.16, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the sequential method of registration was significantly better than that of drawing regions of interest or directly coregistering the SPECT image to an MRI. It is, however, tedious and time-consuming. The simplified two-step method yields similar results and is more practical for clinical I-123 ADAM SPECT studies.
机译:背景:I-123 ADAM单光子发射断层扫描(SPECT)分析通常是通过绘制感兴趣的区域或将SPECT图像直接注册到磁共振图像(MRI)来进行的。每种方法都受观察者或配准偏差的限制。方法:在静脉注射185 MBq I-123 ADAM后,使用三头γ相机和扇形光束准直仪招募11名健康志愿者进行I-123 ADAM SPECT。我们提出了两种新的注册方法:顺序注册和两步注册。使用相互信息通过顺序和两步方法将重建的图像注册到MRI。结果:连续和两步法中脑活动平均计数无明显差异(166.1 +/- 4.3与164.2 +/- 4.1,P = 0.273),但明显高于直接法平均计数(132.8) +/- 3.7,P <0.001)。序贯和两步法中脑/小脑比率没有显着差异(4.40 +/- 0.37 vs. 4.28 +/- 0.34,P = 0.277),但它们明显高于直接法中脑/小脑比率(1.68 + / -0.16,P <0.001)。结论:顺序配准方法的准确性明显优于绘制感兴趣区域或将SPECT图像直接配准至MRI。然而,这是乏味且耗时的。简化的两步法产生相似的结果,并且对于临床I-123 ADAM SPECT研究更为实用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号