...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical focus >Comparison of seizure control outcomes and the safety of vagus nerve, thalamic deep brain, and responsive neurostimulation: Evidence from randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Comparison of seizure control outcomes and the safety of vagus nerve, thalamic deep brain, and responsive neurostimulation: Evidence from randomized controlled trials

机译:癫痫发作控制结果与迷走神经,丘脑深脑和反应性神经刺激的安全性比较:来自随机对照试验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Epilepsy is a devastating disease, often refractory to medication and not amenable to resective surgery. For patients whose seizures continue despite the best medical and surgical therapy, 3 stimulation-based therapies have demonstrated positive results in prospective randomized trials: vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation of the thalamic anterior nucleus, and responsive neurostimulation. All 3 neuromodulatory therapies offer significant reductions in seizure frequency for patients with partial epilepsy. A direct comparison of trial results, however, reveals important differences among outcomes and surgical risk between devices. The authors review published results from these pivotal trials and highlight important differences between the trials and devices and their application in clinical use.
机译:癫痫病是毁灭性疾病,通常对药物难治且不适合切除手术。对于尽管采取了最佳的医学和外科手术疗法仍持续发作的患者,在前瞻性随机试验中,有3种基于刺激的疗法已显示出积极的结果:迷走神经刺激,丘脑前核深层脑刺激和响应性神经刺激。对于部分癫痫患者,所有3种神经调节疗法均能显着降低癫痫发作频率。然而,对试验结果的直接比较显示,器械之间的结局和手术风险之间存在重要差异。作者回顾了这些关键性试验的已发表结果,并强调了试验和装置及其在临床应用中的重要区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号