首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >On dissociating the neural time course of the processing of positive emotions
【24h】

On dissociating the neural time course of the processing of positive emotions

机译:分离积极情绪处理的神经时间过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Providing evidence for categorical theories of emotion mandates the inclusion of discrete emotion categories beyond the typical six "basic" emotions. Traditional neurophysiological investigations of emotion typically feature the six basic emotions with happiness as the lone positive exemplar. Here we studied how event-related potentials (ERPs) might differentiate between two positive emotional expressions: happiness and pride, and if so, at what time interval. Furthermore, given divergent findings in the ERP literature with respect to viewing emotional expressions, we explicitly examined how task type modulates neurophysiological responses when the same stimuli are viewed. While a continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded, 20 healthy participants completed two tasks: an implicit task where participants judged whether or not a face featured a brown spot (freckle), and an explicit task where they judged the face as portraying a "happy," "proud," or "neutral" expression. Behavioral performance exceeded 90% accuracy on both tasks. In the explicit task, participants responded faster and more accurately for Happy compared to Proud and Neutral expressions. Neurophysiologically, amplitudes for N170, VPP and P250 ERPs differentiated emotional from neutral expressions, but not from each other. In contrast, the late SPW component significantly differentiated Happy and Proud expressions from each other. Moreover, main effects of Task were found for the VPP, P250, LPP and SPW; additionally, Emotion X Task interactions were observed for P250 and SPW. Our data stress that task demands may magnify or diminish neural processing differences between emotion categories, which therefore cannot be disentangled with a single experimental paradigm. Additionally, some ERP differences may also reflect variations in categorization difficulty. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为情感的分类理论提供证据要求将离散的情感类别包括在典型的六种“基本”情感之外。传统的情绪神经生理学研究通常以六种基本情绪为特征,其中幸福是唯一的积极榜样。在这里,我们研究了与事件相关的电位(ERP)如何在两种积极的情感表达方式之间进行区分:幸福和自豪感;如果是,则在什么时间间隔。此外,鉴于ERP文献中关于观察情感表达的不同发现,我们明确地研究了当观察相同刺激时任务类型如何调节神经生理反应。在记录连续脑电图(EEG)的同时,有20位健康的参与者完成了两项任务:一项隐性任务,其中参与者判断面部是否有褐色斑点(雀斑);以及一项明确任务,他们将面部描述为“幸福”。 ,“骄傲”或“中性”表达。两项任务的行为表现均超过90%的准确性。在明确的任务中,与“骄傲”和“中立”表达相比,参与者对“快乐”的反应更快,更准确。从神经生理学的角度来看,N170,VPP和P250 ERP的振幅将情感表达与中性表达区分开,但彼此之间没有区别。相反,后期的SPW组件将Happy和Proud表达彼此区分开。此外,发现Task对VPP,P250,LPP和SPW的主要影响。此外,对于P250和SPW,还观察到了Emotion X Task交互。我们的数据强调,任务需求可能会放大或缩小情感类别之间的神经处理差异,因此无法用单个实验范式来解决。此外,某些ERP差异也可能反映出分类难度的差异。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号