首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Event-related potentials indicate that fluency can be interpreted as familiarity
【24h】

Event-related potentials indicate that fluency can be interpreted as familiarity

机译:与事件相关的潜力表明,流利程度可以解释为熟悉程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent evidence suggests that fluency may be capable of supporting recognition independently of familiarity. This hypothesis was further tested in the present study. 29 participants encoded name-brand and off-brand products in an incidental task. Participants then judged whether the product was old or new during two tests with products from one category (i.e., only name-brand or only off-brand products) and a mixed test (where both name-brand and off-brand products were shown). The ERP data elicited by off-brand products varied as a function of test format. During the mixed test, off-brand products were correlated with a FN400 effect, whereas a fluency ERP (old ERPs were more negative than new at parietal electrodes 225-400 ms) was observed during the other test. Importantly, no FN400 was detected during this test. The ERP results suggest that viewing the off-brand products during the mixed test produced a familiarity experience; however, fluency supported recognition when viewing off-brand products on the other test. The results are strong evidence that top-down processing of visual features during recognition interprets the information relative to the context. This process results in either fluency or, in other contexts, it is interpreted as familiarity as the Discrepancy-Attribution Hypothesis (Whittlesea and Williams, 2001a, 2001b) contends. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的证据表明,流利性可能能够独立于熟悉度而支持识别。在本研究中进一步检验了这一假设。 29名参与者在一项偶然任务中对名牌产品和非品牌产品进行了编码。然后,参与者在两次测试中使用一个类别的产品(即,仅名牌产品或仅副牌产品)和混合测试(其中同时显示名牌和副牌产品)来判断产品是旧的还是新的。 。品牌外产品引起的ERP数据随测试格式而变化。在混合测试期间,品牌外产品与FN400效果相关,而在另一项测试中观察到流利的ERP(在顶电极225-400 ms处,旧的ERP比新的ERP阴性)。重要的是,在此测试期间未检测到FN400。 ERP结果表明,在混合测试中查看品牌外产品会产生熟悉的体验。但是,在其他测试中查看非品牌产品时,流利性支持识别。结果是有力的证据,表明在识别过程中自上而下的视觉特征处理可以解释与上下文有关的信息。这个过程导致了流利,或者在其他情况下,它被解释为“差异归因假设”(Whittlesea和Williams,2001a,2001b)所主张的熟悉程度。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号