首页> 外文期刊>Biology and fertility of soils: Cooperating Journal of the International Society of Soil Science >An inter-laboratory comparison of multi-enzyme and multiple substrate-induced respiration assays to assess method consistency in soil monitoring
【24h】

An inter-laboratory comparison of multi-enzyme and multiple substrate-induced respiration assays to assess method consistency in soil monitoring

机译:实验室间比较多种酶和多种底物诱导的呼吸测定法,以评估土壤监测中方法的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of indicators in soil monitoring schemes to detect changes in soil quality is receiving increased attention, particularly the application of soil biological methods. However, to date, the ability to compare information from different laboratories applying soil microbiological techniques in broad-scale monitoring has rarely been taken into account. This study aimed to assess the consistency and repeatability of two techniques that are being evaluated for use as microbiological indicators of soil quality: multi-enzyme activity assay and multiple substrate-induced respiration (MSIR). Data were tested for intrinsic (within-assay plate) variation, inter-laboratory repeatability (geometric mean regression and correlation coefficient) and land-use discrimination (principal components analysis). Intrinsic variation was large for both assays suggesting that high replicate numbers are required. Inter-laboratory repeatability showed diverging patterns for the enzyme assay and MSIR. Discrimination of soils was significant for both techniques with relatively consistent patterns; however, combined laboratory discrimination analyses for each technique showed inconsistent correspondence between the laboratories. These issues could be addressed through the adoption of reliable analytical standards for biological methods along with adequate replication. However, until the former is addressed, dispersed analyses are not currently advisable for monitoring schemes.
机译:在土壤监测计划中使用指标来检测土壤质量的变化正受到越来越多的关注,尤其是土壤生物学方法的应用。但是,迄今为止,很少有人考虑将应用土壤微生物技术的不同实验室的信息进行大规模监测的能力进行比较。这项研究旨在评估被评估为土壤质量微生物指标的两种技术的一致性和可重复性:多酶活性测定法和多种底物诱导的呼吸作用(MSIR)。测试数据的内在(分析板内)变化,实验室间可重复性(几何均值回归和相关系数)和土地利用判别(主要成分分析)。两种测定的内在差异均很大,表明需要大量重复。实验室间的重复性显示了酶测定和MSIR的差异模式。两种技术均具有相对一致的模式,因此土壤的识别意义重大。但是,每种技术的综合实验室鉴别分析表明,实验室之间的对应关系不一致。这些问题可以通过采用可靠的生物方法分析标准以及适当的复制来解决。但是,在解决前者之前,目前不建议对监控方案进行分散分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号