首页> 外文期刊>Neurology Asia >Diagnostic accuracy of neuropsychological tests for classification of dementia
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of neuropsychological tests for classification of dementia

机译:神经心理学测试对痴呆症分类的诊断准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although numerous studies have shown that each neuropsychological test is effective for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD), studies comparing diagnostic accuracies of various neuropsychological tests are relatively rare and practical cutoff values are not available. The present study aimed to investigate the validity of neuropsychological tests and develop cutoff values for each in differentiating healthy control (HC), MCI and AD groups. A total of 84 HC, 187 with MCI and 195 with AD were evaluated by the selected seven neuropsychological tests using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Logical Memory (LM) delayed recall (cutoff, 7) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) delayed recall (cutoff, 6) were effective for differentiating HC from MCI. To distinguish MCI and AD, Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) 3 min-delayed recall (cutoff, 6) and LM immediate recall (cutoff, 4) were excellent. Delayed recall of verbal materials, as indexed by LM and RAVLT was sensitive for discriminating MCI from HC. Handling visual memory traces, as indexed by ROCFT and immediate verbal information by LM were sensitive for differentiating MCI and AD.
机译:尽管大量研究表明,每种神经心理学测试对于诊断轻度认知障碍(MCI)或阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)都是有效的,但是比较各种神经心理学测试的诊断准确性的研究相对很少,并且尚无实际的临界值。本研究旨在调查神经心理学测试的有效性,并为区分健康对照组(HC),MCI和AD组的每一个制定临界值。通过使用接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析的选定的7种神经心理学测试评估了84种HC,187种MCI和195种AD。逻辑记忆(LM)延迟召回(临界值,7)和雷伊听觉语言学习测验(RAVLT)延迟记忆(临界值,6)对区分HC和MCI是有效的。为了区分MCI和AD,Rey Osterrieth复杂图形测试(ROCFT)的3分钟延迟召回(截止6)和LM立即召回(截止4)非常好。 LM和RAVLT索引的口头材料延迟召回对于区分MCI和HC很敏感。 ROCFT索引处理的视觉记忆痕迹和LM处理的即时语言信息对区分MCI和AD很敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号