首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Brain MAPS: an automated, accurate and robust brain extraction technique using a template library.
【24h】

Brain MAPS: an automated, accurate and robust brain extraction technique using a template library.

机译:Brain MAPS:使用模板库的自动化,准确且强大的大脑提取技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whole brain extraction is an important pre-processing step in neuroimage analysis. Manual or semi-automated brain delineations are labour-intensive and thus not desirable in large studies, meaning that automated techniques are preferable. The accuracy and robustness of automated methods are crucial because human expertise may be required to correct any suboptimal results, which can be very time consuming. We compared the accuracy of four automated brain extraction methods: Brain Extraction Tool (BET), Brain Surface Extractor (BSE), Hybrid Watershed Algorithm (HWA) and a Multi-Atlas Propagation and Segmentation (MAPS) technique we have previously developed for hippocampal segmentation. The four methods were applied to extract whole brains from 682 1.5T and 157 3T T(1)-weighted MR baseline images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Semi-automated brain segmentations with manual editing and checking were used as the gold-standard to compare with the results. The median Jaccard index of MAPS was higher than HWA, BET and BSE in 1.5T and 3T scans (p<0.05, all tests), and the 1st to 99th centile range of the Jaccard index of MAPS was smaller than HWA, BET and BSE in 1.5T and 3T scans ( p<0.05, all tests). HWA and MAPS were found to be best at including all brain tissues (median false negative rate
机译:全脑提取是神经图像分析中重要的预处理步骤。手动或半自动的脑部描述是劳动密集型的,因此在大型研究中是不希望的,这意味着自动技术是可取的。自动化方法的准确性和鲁棒性至关重要,因为可能需要专业人员来纠正任何次优的结果,这可能会非常耗时。我们比较了四种自动脑部提取方法的准确性:脑部提取工具(BET),脑表面提取器(BSE),混合分水岭算法(HWA)和我们先前为海马分割开发的多图谱传播和分割(MAPS)技术。这四种方法被用于从阿尔茨海默氏病神经影像计划数据库中的682个1.5T和157个3T T(1)加权MR基线图像中提取全脑。具有自动编辑和检查功能的半自动脑分割被用作黄金标准以与结果进行比较。在1.5T和3T扫描中,MAPS的中位Jaccard指数高于HWA,BET和BSE(p <0.05,所有测试),MAPS的Jaccard指数的第1至第99个百分点范围小于HWA,BET和BSE在1.5T和3T扫描中进行分析(p <0.05,所有测试)。发现HWA和MAPS最适合包括所有脑组织(两种方法的1.5T扫描中值假阴性率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号