首页> 外文期刊>Neuro-psychoanalysis : >The Oxford-style debate: the 15th neuropsychoanalysis congress, New York, 2014
【24h】

The Oxford-style debate: the 15th neuropsychoanalysis congress, New York, 2014

机译:牛津式辩论:第15届神经心理分析大会,纽约,2014年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following the successful debut of Oxford-style debates in the congresses of Athens and Cape Town, the 15th neuropsychoanalysis congress had its own motion: This house believes that neuroscientific terms must never replace psychoanalytic ones. Moderated by Katerina Fotopoulou, the debate took on one of the biggest discussions in neuropsychoanalysis, which is that of two languages in a dialogue that are thus exposed to mutual influence and updating, but not necessarily to supplanting each other. There are several opinions on the topic, and four colleagues who have been active in the neu-roscience-psychoanalysis dialogue for a number of years were asked to share their thoughts. For the motion were Ariane Bazan and Richard Kessler. Against were Lisa Ouss and Nikolai Axmacher.
机译:继牛津式辩论在雅典和开普敦的大会上成功亮相之后,第15届神经心理分析大会有了自己的动议:该院认为,神经科学术语绝不能取代心理分析术语。在Katerina Fotopoulou的主持下,辩论进行了神经精神分析领域最大的讨论之一,这是两种语言的对话,因此它们相互影响和更新,但不一定相互替代。关于该主题有几种意见,并请活跃于神经科学,精神分析对话多年的四位同事分享他们的想法。提出动议的是阿里安·巴赞(Ariane Bazan)和理查德·凯斯勒(Richard Kessler)。反对者是Lisa Ouss和Nikolai Axmacher。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号