...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Interpreting Auckland's volcanic governance through an institutional lens
【24h】

Interpreting Auckland's volcanic governance through an institutional lens

机译:通过制度视角解读奥克兰的火山治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents critical reflections on the governance of natural hazards, in the context of New Zealand's Auckland volcanic field (AVF). The AVF is unusual given that there is an urban area built on this active field, and the potential for a volcanic eruption is clearly identified as a natural hazard. The occurrence of another volcanic event on the AVF seems certain. The timing of the next event remains, however, enigmatic. The problem in terms of governance of a natural volcanic hazard in Auckland is a matter not of 'if', but 'when'. Using the AVF as a case study, we place existing governance structures within a New Institutional Economics framework and, in turn, critique the role of key institutional actors across time, using Williamson's Economist 146(1):23-58, (1998) four levels of institutional analysis. In particular, we note the key challenge of incorporating time into AVF governance and socio-economic planning. Overall, this paper provides a theoretical framework for evaluating disaster recovery, in this case taking the existing legal and institutional framework of volcanic risk governance in Auckland, to assist the practical management of a low probability, but potentially high-impact natural hazard.
机译:本文提出了在新西兰奥克兰火山场(AVF)的背景下对自然灾害治理的批判性思考。鉴于在这个活动区域上建有市区,因此AVF很不寻常,火山爆发的可能性也被明确识别为自然灾害。 AVF上又发生了一次火山事件,似乎是肯定的。但是,下一个事件的时间安排仍然令人费解。就奥克兰自然火山灾害的治理而言,问题不是“如果”,而是“何时”。以AVF为例,我们将现有的治理结构置于新制度经济学框架之内,并反过来利用威廉姆森的《经济学家》 146(1):23-58,(1998)4批判关键机构参与者在整个时期的角色。制度分析的水平。特别是,我们注意到将时间纳入AVF治理和社会经济计划的主要挑战。总体而言,本文提供了评估灾难恢复的理论框架,在这种情况下,它采用了奥克兰现有的火山风险治理法律和制度框架,以协助对可能性较小但潜在影响较大的自然灾害进行实际管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号