...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Comparison of Two Empirical Models for Gully-Specific Debris Flow Hazard Assessment in Xiaojiang Valley of Southwestern China
【24h】

Comparison of Two Empirical Models for Gully-Specific Debris Flow Hazard Assessment in Xiaojiang Valley of Southwestern China

机译:西南小江流域两种沟壑泥石流危险性评估经验模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two sets of empirical models for debris flow hazard assessment on gully-specific scale ate presented herein, which may be the first step toward developing a formalized procedure for debris flow hazard assessment Emphasis is put on comparison of the two models between Multiple Factor Composite Assessment Model (MFCAM) and Multivariate Stepwise Regression Assessment Model (MSRAM). From the aspects of data acquisition and model construct, this paper shows the advantages and limitations of two models From the assessment results, two models are still of uncertainty Fundamental researches of debris flow hazard, especially the relationship between debris flow magnitude and its frequency of occurrence should be given a priority in future study.
机译:本文介绍了两组针对沟壑特定尺度的泥石流危害评估的经验模型,这可能是制定泥石流危害评估的正式程序的第一步。着重于比较两个模型之间的多因素综合评估模型(MFCAM)和多元逐步回归评估模型(MSRAM)。从数据采集和模型构建两个方面,说明了两种模型的优点和局限性。从评估结果来看,两种模型仍存在不确定性。泥石流灾害的基础研究,尤其是泥石流大小与其发生频率的关系。在以后的研究中应优先考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号