首页> 外文期刊>Neuroepidemiology >Validation of the telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia.
【24h】

Validation of the telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia.

机译:对于具有正常认知,轻度认知障碍或痴呆症的受试者的认知状态进行修改的电话访谈的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The telephone assessment of cognitive functions may reduce the cost and burden of epidemiological studies. METHODS: We validated the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) using an extensive in-person assessment as the standard for comparison. Clinical diagnoses of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were established by consensus of physician, nurse, and neuropsychological assessments. RESULTS: The extensive in-person assessment classified 83 persons with normal cognition, 42 persons with MCI, and 42 persons with dementia. There was considerable overlap in TICS-m scores among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified < or = 31 as the optimal cutoff score to separate subjects with MCI from subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 71.4%; subjects with dementia excluded), and < or = 27 to separate subjects with dementia from subjects with MCI (sensitivity = 69.0%; subjects with normal cognition excluded). The TICS-m performed well when subjects with MCI were pooled either with subjects with dementia (sensitivity = 83.3%) or with subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the TICS-m performed well when using a dichotomous classification of cognitive status, it performed only fairly in separating MCI from either normal cognition or dementia. The TICS-m should not be used as a free-standing tool to identify subjects with MCI, and it should be used with caution as a tool to detect dementia.
机译:背景:认知功能的电话评估可以减少流行病学研究的成本和负担。方法:我们使用广泛的面对面评估作为比较标准,验证了电话访问的认知状态修改(TICS-m)。正常认知,轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆的临床诊断是通过医师,护士和神经心理学评估的共识而建立的。结果:广泛的面对面评估对83名具有正常认知能力的人,42名MCI患者和42名痴呆症患者进行了分类。三组之间的TICS-m得分有相当大的重叠。接收器工作特性曲线确定<或= 31为区分具有MCI的受试者和具有正常认知能力的受试者(敏感性= 71.4%;不包括痴呆症的受试者)的最佳截止分数,并且<或= 27是将痴呆症的受试者与MCI受试者分开的最佳临界值(敏感性= 69.0%;认知正常的受试者除外)。当MCI患者与痴呆患者(敏感性= 83.3%)或认知正常的患者(敏感性= 83.3%)合并时,TICS-m表现良好。结论:尽管TICS-m在使用认知状态的二分分类法时表现良好,但仅在将MCI与正常认知或痴呆症分开时才发挥相当的作用。 TICS-m不应用作识别MCI受试者的独立工具,而应谨慎用作检测痴呆的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号