...
首页> 外文期刊>Nematological research >Are community structures of soil nematodes different between organic and conventional farming systems in commercial tomato fields?
【24h】

Are community structures of soil nematodes different between organic and conventional farming systems in commercial tomato fields?

机译:商业番茄田中有机和常规耕作系统的土壤线虫群落结构是否不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Compared with studies conducted in experimental crop fields, those in commercial fields have been very limited to examining how organic (ORG) and conventional (CONV) farming systems differ in their effects on biological and physicochemical characteristics of soils. To evaluate practical effects of ORG systems, a comparison is essential with "practical" CONV systems where organic amendments are also used in addition to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. We compared nematode community structures between the two systems for commercial tomato production in greenhouses located in northern Japan in 2005 and 2006. We examined if the farming system was still influential even when differences in soil texture, study plot locations and- growing seasons amongthe plots were considered. The density of the predator-omnivore group, with Dorylaimida as the dominant taxon, and Structure Index were always significantly affected by farming system, and their values were greater in ORG. Redundancy analysis in 2005 revealed that farming system could significantly explain the whole community structure, and determined Dorylaimida as an indicator for ORG, while Diplogasteridae and Anguinidae were indicators for CONV. Although redundancy analysis could not significantlyexplain community structure with farming system in 2006, Dorylaimida and Diplogasteridae were still good indicators for the two systems. Individual variables, such as soil texture and bacterial density, were found to have significant effects on the two nematode taxa, although we could not interpret sufficiently the causal relationships. Further studies should include other measurements such as chemical pesticides applied for better interpretation of the differences between these systems.
机译:与在试验性农作物领域进行的研究相比,商业领域的研究仅限于研究有机(ORG)和常规(CONV)耕作系统对土壤生物学和理化特性的影响如何不同。为了评估ORG系统的实际效果,必须与“实用” CONV系统进行比较,在CONV系统中,除化肥和杀虫剂外还使用有机改性剂。我们比较了2005年和2006年日本北部温室中用于商业化番茄生产的两种系统之间的线虫群落结构。我们研究了即使土壤质地,研究地点位置和种植季节不同,农作系统是否仍具有影响力。考虑过的。以Dorylaimida为主要分类单元的捕食性杂食动物群的密度和结构指数始终受耕作制度的显着影响,在ORG中其值更大。 2005年的冗余分析表明,耕作制度可以显着解释整个群落结构,并确定Dorylaimida为ORG的指标,而Diplogasteridae和Anguinidae为CONV的指标。尽管冗余分析无法在2006年用农耕系统显着解释群落结构,但Dorylaimida和Diplogasteridae仍是这两种系统的良好指标。尽管我们无法充分解释因果关系,但发现诸如土壤质地和细菌密度之类的单个变量对两个线虫类群有显着影响。进一步的研究应包括其他测量方法,例如化学农药,以更好地解释这些系统之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号