...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroradiology >MR imaging and differentiation of cerebral fat embolism syndrome from diffuse axonal injury: Application of diffusion tensor imaging
【24h】

MR imaging and differentiation of cerebral fat embolism syndrome from diffuse axonal injury: Application of diffusion tensor imaging

机译:弥漫性轴索损伤的脑脂肪栓塞综合征的磁共振成像和鉴别:弥散张量成像的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Cerebral fat embolism syndrome (CFES) mimics diffuse axonal injury (DAI) on MRI with vasogenic edema, cytotoxic edema, and micro-hemorrhages, making specific diagnosis a challenge. The objective of our study is to determine and compare the diagnostic utility of the conventional MRI and DTI in differentiating cerebral fat embolism syndrome from diffuse axonal injury. Methods: This retrospective study was performed after recruiting 11 patients with severe CFES and ten patients with severe DAI. Three trauma radiologists analyzed conventional MR images to determine the presence or absence of CFES and DAI. DTI analysis of the whole-brain white matter was performed to obtain the directional diffusivities. The results were correlated with clinical diagnosis to determine the diagnostic utility of conventional MRI and DTI. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional MRI in diagnosing CFES, obtained from the pooled data were 76, 85, and 80 %, respectively. Mean radial diffusivity (RD) was significantly higher and the mean fractional anisotropy (FA) was lower in CFES and differentiated subjects with CFES from the DAI group. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for conventional MRI was 0.82, and for the differentiating DTI parameters the values were 0.75 (RD) and 0.86 (FA), respectively. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between diagnostic performance of DTI and conventional MRI in CFES, but a difference in directional diffusivities was clearly identified between CFES and DAI.
机译:简介:脑脂肪栓塞综合征(CFES)模仿MRI上的弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI),包括血管源性水肿,细胞毒性水肿和微出血,这对特定的诊断提出了挑战。我们研究的目的是确定和比较常规MRI和DTI在区分脑脂肪栓塞综合征和弥漫性轴索损伤中的诊断作用。方法:这项回顾性研究是在招募11例严重CFES患者和10例严重DAI患者之后进行的。三名创伤放射科医生分析了常规的MR图像,以确定是否存在CFES和DAI。进行全脑白质的DTI分析以获得方向扩散性。将结果与临床诊断相关,以确定常规MRI和DTI的诊断效用。结果:从汇总数据中获得的常规MRI诊断CFES的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为76%,85%和80%。 CFES和来自DAI组的CFES分化受试者的平均径向扩散率(RD)明显较高,而平均分数各向异性(FA)则较低。传统MRI的接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线下方面积为0.82,而差分DTI参数的值分别为0.75(RD)和0.86(FA)。结论:DTI与常规MRI对CFES的诊断性能无显着差异,但CFES与DAI之间的方向扩散性明显不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号