首页> 外文期刊>Near surface geophysics >Comparative study of local versus global methods for 1D joint inversion of direct current resistivity and time-domain electromagnetic data
【24h】

Comparative study of local versus global methods for 1D joint inversion of direct current resistivity and time-domain electromagnetic data

机译:直流电阻率和时域电磁数据一维联合反演的局部方法和全局方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Direct current resistivity and time-domain electromagnetic (TDEM) surveys are often used in environmental,hydrological and mining evaluation. The interpretation of the data acquired with each of these geophysical methods, assuming one-dimensional models, frequently produces ambiguous results. The joint inversion of TDEM and direct current resistivity data is considered by several authors as an efficient method to reduce the ambiguity inherent to each of these methods. This paper presents the results of a comparative study on the use of a local optimization method, iteratively reweighted least squares and global optimization methods of simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization in the joint inversion of TDEM and direct current resistivity data. The models obtained from joint inversion of synthetic data (H- and K-type) and of experimental data using the three methods yield similar results. The iteratively reweighted least squares method is the fastest while the simulated annealing is the most time-consuming. Simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization are the most efficient methods when studying equivalence problems.
机译:直流电阻率和时域电磁(TDEM)测量通常用于环境,水文和采矿评估中。假设采用一维模型,对用这些地球物理方法中的每一种获取的数据的解释通常会产生不明确的结果。几位作者认为TDEM和直流电阻率数据的联合反演是减少这些方法固有的歧义的有效方法。本文介绍了在TDEM和直流电阻率数据联合反演中使用局部优化方法,迭代加权最小二乘法以及模拟退火和粒子群优化的全局优化方法的比较研究结果。使用三种方法从合成数据(H型和K型)和实验数据的联合反演中获得的模型得出相似的结果。迭代重新加权最小二乘方法最快,而模拟退火则最耗时。当研究等价问题时,模拟退火和粒子群优化是最有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号