首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology >Colorectal cancer: Comparison of colorectal cancer screening strategies
【24h】

Colorectal cancer: Comparison of colorectal cancer screening strategies

机译:大肠癌:大肠癌筛查策略的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent meta-analysis has found that endoscopy is much more effective than faecal tests for detecting advanced neoplasia, which mitigates the increased participation rate of faecal testing.To be effective, screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) must balance accuracy with population attendance. "Low participation rates dilute the intrinsic efficacy of CRC screening tests, reducing the overall yield for advanced neoplasia in a population setting," explains Cesare Hassan, lead author of the meta-analysis.
机译:最近的一项荟萃​​分析发现,内窥镜检查在检测晚期肿瘤时比粪便检查更有效,这可以减轻粪便检查参与率的增加。要有效,大肠癌(CRC)筛查检查必须在准确性和人群出勤率之间取得平衡。荟萃分析的主要作者塞萨尔·哈桑(Cesare Hassan)解释说:“低参与率稀释了CRC筛查测试的内在功效,降低了人群中晚期肿瘤形成的总产量。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号