...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: Application to an article in cancer
【24h】

Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: Application to an article in cancer

机译:研究人员,审稿人,编辑和媒体未能理解癌症筛查研究中的缺陷:在一篇癌症文章中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Observational studies present inferential challenges. These challenges are acute in cancer screening studies, in which lead-time and length biases are ever present. These biases can make any study worthless. Moreover, a flawed study's impact on the public can be deleterious when its conclusions are publicized by a na?ve media. Flawed studies can also make the public learn to be wary of any article or reports of articles claiming to be scientific. Here, the author addresses these and related issues in the context of a study published in Cancer.
机译:观察性研究提出了推论性挑战。在癌症筛查研究中,这些挑战是严峻的,在这些研究中,交货时间和长度存在偏差。这些偏见会使任何研究毫无价值。此外,有缺陷的研究如果被幼稚的媒体公布,其结论对公众的影响可能是有害的。有缺陷的研究还可以使公众学会警惕任何自称科学的文章或报道。在此,作者在《癌症》上发表的一项研究中解决了这些及相关问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号