...
首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Is the central portal a safe approach for arthroscopy of the knee?
【24h】

Is the central portal a safe approach for arthroscopy of the knee?

机译:中央门是否是安全的膝关节镜检查方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read with interest the report by Bayar et al.. Recently, my colleagues and I submitted a similar study to Current Orthopedic Practice (in review), stimulated by the concerns regarding with the transtendineal arthroscopic portal. Several papers after the original publication by Gillquist and Hagberg have shown the central approach is a useful portal in knee arthroscopy. Eriksson, however, in a cadaveric study, found that this does not offer any major advantages compared with the standard lateral portal. In addition, this portal has been associated with increased postoperative pain, and decreased isokinetic quadriceps strength postoperatively. Complications, such as peritendinitis, tendinitis or tendon granuloma have been reported.
机译:我饶有兴趣地阅读了Bayar等人的报告。最近,我和我的同事们提交了与“当前骨科实践”相似的研究(正在复习中),这受到对跨膜式关节镜门的担忧的刺激。吉尔奎斯特(Gillquist)和哈格伯格(Hagberg)最初发表论文后的几篇论文表明,这种中心方法是膝关节镜检查的有用门户。然而,埃里克森(Eriksson)在尸体研究中发现,与标准的侧向门脉相比,这没有任何主要优势。此外,该门脉与术后疼痛增加,术后等速四头肌力量降低有关。据报道有并发症,如腱鞘炎,肌腱炎或肌腱肉芽肿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号