...
首页> 外文期刊>Movement disorders >Impact of cognitive task on the posture of elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy elderly subjects.
【24h】

Impact of cognitive task on the posture of elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy elderly subjects.

机译:与健康老人相比,认知任务对阿尔茨海默氏病老人的姿势的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aims of this study were to analyze the effects of cognitive task on static posture in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in healthy elderly (HE) subjects and to evaluate whether those effects were greater in AD subjects than in HE subjects. We performed a posturographic analysis on 13 subjects with mild AD (mean age, 79.7+/-5.1 years, Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 18 and 23) and on 17 HE subjects (mean age, 78.5+/-4.4 years). After watching a video sequence, the subjects were asked to maintain a stable upright posture while standing on a force platform. Then, the postural sway was measured during the following two conditions: (1) quiet standing and (2) both standing and answering questions about the video sequence. We were interested in the center of pressure (CoP) area and path. For each group, the single task was compared to the dual task for the CoP area and path. We also compared the variability of both CoP area (variation of the CoP area between the single and the dual task) and path (variation of the CoP path between the single and the dual task) between the two groups. We showed that there was no significant difference between the single and the dual task in HE subjects concerning the CoP area and path, in contrast to the AD group, and that variability of both the CoP area and path were significantly greater in the AD subjects than in the HE subjects. This finding may contribute to the risk of falls in AD patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析认知任务对阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和健康老人(HE)受试者的静态姿势的影响,并评估AD受试者的这些姿势是否比HE受试者更大。我们对13名轻度AD(平均年龄,79.7 +/- 5.1岁,轻度精神状态检查评分在18和23之间)的受试者和17名HE受试者(平均年龄,78.5 +/- 4.4岁)进行了事后分析。观看视频序列后,要求受试者站立在受力平台上时保持稳定的直立姿势。然后,在以下两个条件下测量姿势的摇摆:(1)安静站立和(2)站立并回答有关视频序列的问题。我们对压力中心(CoP)区域和路径感兴趣。对于每个组,将CoP区域和路径的单个任务与双重任务进行比较。我们还比较了两组之间CoP区域(单任务和双任务之间CoP区域的变化)和路径(单任务和双任务之间CoP路径的变化)的变异性。我们发现,与AD组相比,HE受试者在CoP区域和路径方面的单项任务和双重任务之间没有显着差异,并且与AD组相比,CoP区域和路径的变异性均显着大于AD组。在HE科目中。这一发现可能会增加AD患者跌倒的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号