首页> 外文期刊>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution >Comparison of five methods for delimitating species in Ophion Fabricius, a diverse genus of parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)
【24h】

Comparison of five methods for delimitating species in Ophion Fabricius, a diverse genus of parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)

机译:Ophion Fabricius中的五种定界方法的比较,Ophion Fabricius是寄生类黄蜂的不同属(膜翅目,I科)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

DNA taxonomy has been proposed as a method to quickly assess diversity and species limits in highly diverse, understudied taxa. Here we use five methods for species delimitation and two genetic markers (COI and ITS2) to assess species diversity within the parasitoid genus, Ophion. We searched for compensatory base changes (CBC's) in ITS2, and determined that they are too rare to be of practical use in delimiting species in this genus. The other four methods used both COI and ITS2, and included distance-based (threshold analysis and ABGD) and tree-based (GMYC and PTP) models. We compared the results of these analyses to each other under various parameters and tested their performance with respect to 11 Nearctic species/morphospecies and 15 described Palearctic species. We also computed barcode accumulation curves of COI sequences to assess the completeness of sampling. The species count was highly variable depending on the method and parameters used, ranging from 47 to 168 species, with more conservative estimates of 89-121 species. Despite this range, many of the Nearctic test species were fairly robust with respect to method. We concluded that while there was often good congruence between methods, GMYC and PTP were less reliant on arbitrary parameters than the other two methods and more easily applied to genetic markers other than COI. However, PTP was less successful at delimiting test species than was GMYC. All methods, as well as the barcode accumulation curves, indicate that several Palearctic species remain undescribed and that we have scarcely begun to appreciate the Nearctic diversity within this genus. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:已经提出了DNA分类法,作为一种快速评估高度多样化,研究不足的分类单元中的多样性和物种限制的方法。在这里,我们使用五种方法来进行物种划界,并使用两个遗传标记(COI和ITS2)来评估拟寄生虫属Ophion中的物种多样性。我们在ITS2中搜索了补偿性碱基变化(CBC),并确定它们太稀少了,无法实际用于界定该属中的物种。其他四种方法同时使用了COI和ITS2,包括基于距离的模型(阈值分析和ABGD)和基于树的模型(GMYC和PTP)。我们将这些分析的结果在各种参数下进行了相互比较,并测试了它们对11种近缘种/形态和15种描述的古北种的性能。我们还计算了COI序列的条形码积累曲线,以评估采样的完整性。根据使用的方法和参数,物种数量变化很大,范围从47到168种,保守估计为89-121种。尽管有这个范围,但是许多Nearctic测试物种在方法上都相当强大。我们得出的结论是,尽管方法之间通常具有很好的一致性,但GMYC和PTP相对于其他两种方法较少依赖于任意参数,并且更易于应用于COI以外的遗传标记。但是,PTP在划定测试物种方面不如GMYC成功。所有方法以及条形码的累积曲线都表明,尚没有描述几种古北种,并且我们几乎没有开始欣赏该属中的近北种。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号