首页> 外文期刊>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution >Utility of COI, CAD and morphological data for resolving relationships within the genus Sarcophaga (sensu lato) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): A preliminary study
【24h】

Utility of COI, CAD and morphological data for resolving relationships within the genus Sarcophaga (sensu lato) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): A preliminary study

机译:利用COI,CAD和形态学数据解决石棺属(Sutus lato)(双翅目:石棺科)内关系的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Currently there are ~3000 known species of Sarcophagidae (Diptera), which are classified into 173 genera in three subfamilies. Almost 25% of sarcophagids belong to the genus Sarcophaga (sensu lato) however little is known about the validity of, and relationships between the ~150 (or more) subgenera of Sarcophaga s.l. In this preliminary study, we evaluated the usefulness of three sources of data for resolving relationships between 35 species from 14 Sarcophaga s.l. subgenera: the mitochondrial COI barcode region, ~800. bp of the nuclear gene CAD, and 110 morphological characters. Bayesian, maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed on the combined dataset. Much of the tree was only supported by the Bayesian and ML analyses, with the MP tree poorly resolved. The genus Sarcophaga s.l. was resolved as monophyletic in both the Bayesian and ML analyses and strong support was obtained at the species-level. Notably, the only subgenus consistently resolved as monophyletic was Liopygia. The monophyly of and relationships between the remaining Sarcophaga s.l. subgenera sampled remain questionable. We suggest that future phylogenetic studies on the genus Sarcophaga s.l. use combined datasets for analyses. We also advocate the use of additional data and a range of inference strategies to assist with resolving relationships within Sarcophaga s.l.
机译:目前,约有3000种已知的石棺科(Diptera),分为三个亚科173个属。几乎有25%的石棺属属于石棺属(Senco lato),但是对石棺属的约150个(或更多)亚属的有效性以及它们之间的关系知之甚少。在这项初步研究中,我们评估了三种数据来源对解决14个石棺属35种物种之间关系的有用性。亚属:线粒体COI条码区域,约800。核基因CAD的bp,具有110个形态特征。对组合数据集进行了贝叶斯,最大似然(ML)和最大简约(MP)分析。大多数树仅由贝叶斯和ML分析支持,而MP树解析较差。石棺属。在贝叶斯分析和ML分析中均被解析为单系统的,并且在物种级别获得了强有力的支持。值得注意的是,唯一一贯被认为是单系的亚目是Liopygia。其余石棺s.l.的单科和之间的关系。采样的亚属仍然值得怀疑。我们建议将来对Sarcophaga s.l.属进行系统发育研究。使用合并的数据集进行分析。我们还提倡使用其他数据和一系列推理策略来协助解决Sarcophaga s.l.中的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号