...
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Stability comparison of concentric tube bulb manometer with conventional U-shaped manometer
【24h】

Stability comparison of concentric tube bulb manometer with conventional U-shaped manometer

机译:同心管灯泡压力计与常规U形压力计的稳定性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In continuation of mass flow rate and error analysis comparison, a different comparative performance study is made between concentric tube bulb manometer (CTB) and U-shaped manometer using stability response equations. Basic response equation of transfer function would hold for both the devices since the same underlying principle of force balance existed. Whilst variation in stability response was evaluated in terms of deviation form of differential height for different lengths of same amount of sensing fluid. This included a step change forcing function of 20 kPa at a constant value of gain. On the basis of smaller characteristic time constant it was concluded that CTB is stable and more prompt in response as compared to U-shaped manometer. Response curves for both the manometers were plotted with the help of MATLAB.
机译:在继续进行质量流率和误差分析比较的过程中,使用稳定性响应方程对同心管球形压力计(CTB)和U形压力计进行了不同的比较性能研究。由于存在相同的基本力平衡原理,因此传递函数的基本响应方程对于这两种设备均适用。同时针对不同长度的相同量的传感流体,根据差分高度的偏差形式评估了稳定性响应的变化。这包括在恒定增益值下具有20 kPa的阶跃变化强制功能。在较小的特征时间常数的基础上,得出结论:与U型压力计相比,CTB稳定且响应更迅速。借助MATLAB绘制了两个压力计的响应曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号