...
首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Planning >Oil & gas/Controversial Leicestershire well
【24h】

Oil & gas/Controversial Leicestershire well

机译:石油/天然气/备受争议的莱斯特郡井

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Proposals by Technology Investment and Exploration Ltd for a well site for 2 years at Vicary Farm, near Woodhouse, Loughborough were deferred by Leicestershire CC in February for a Members' site visit and it was resolved to grant planning permission subject to the prior completion of a S 106 legal agreement covering vehicle routeing and timing of vehicle movements in March (see Mineral Planning 91 p.28). During the debate on the application, the applicant's agent volunteered a financial restoration bond. Following the March resolution, negotiation has been ongoing with TIEL concerning the detail of the S 106 agreement, including the offer of a voluntary restoration bond of 60,000 pounds. The Charnwood Forest Oil Action Group made representations about the adequacy of the Bond and indicated an intention to mount a legal challenge, by way of judicial review to any planning permission which may be issued. It supported this with Counsel's opinion on the matter, which incorporated the view that "the Board has erred in its approach to this application and should be invited to reconsider its decision". The opinion was based on a view that the evidence was that there is no possibility of finding oil and therefore the "significant environmental harm" occasioned by the proposal should lead to refusal of planning permission. The opinion finished by saying "To continue to accept that oil reserves may be found in this location despite the overwhelming independent advice to the contrary would be perverse and irrational". The County Solicitor sought Counsel's opinion which was that the approach adopted by the County Council as to whether oil was present was a reasonable one based on the available evidence. Notwithstanding this, however, the Council should consider the need for and adequacy of any Bond offered to ensure restoration of the land, and this should be completed before the permission is issued. Counsel also suggested a minor amendment to one of the proposed conditions to make it clear that the permission is intended to be temporary.
机译:技术投资与勘探有限公司在拉夫伯勒伍德豪斯附近的维卡里农场(Vicary Farm)的2年井场的提案在2月份被莱斯特郡CC推迟进行会员实地考察,并决定在未事先完成计划的情况下授予规划许可S 106法律协议,涵盖三月份的车辆行驶路线和行驶时间(请参见《矿物规划》 91页28)。在关于申请的辩论中,申请人的代理人自愿提供了一笔经济恢复保证金。继3月份的决议之后,与TIEL正在进行关于S 106协议细节的谈判,包括提供60,000英镑的自愿恢复保证金。查恩伍德森林石油行动小组就债券的适当性发表了意见,并表示打算通过司法审查对可能颁发的任何规划许可提出法律质疑。它支持该意见,并得到律师在此问题上的意见,该意见纳入了以下观点:“董事会对本申请的处理方式有误,应邀请其重新考虑其决定”。该意见是基于这样的观点,即有证据表明不可能发现石油,因此该提案引起的“重大环境损害”应导致拒绝规划许可。最后的意见是:“尽管有大量独立的建议相反,继续接受在这个地方仍可发现石油储备的做法,将是不正当和不合理的”。县律师寻求律师的意见,即根据现有证据,县议会针对是否存在石油采取的方法是合理的。但是,尽管如此,理事会仍应考虑为确保土地恢复而提供的任何保证金的必要性和充分性,并应在发放许可之前完成。律师还建议对提议的条件之一进行小幅修改,以明确表示许可是临时性的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mineral Planning》 |2002年第92期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 矿物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号