首页> 外文期刊>Translational behavioral medicine >Choosing between responsive-design websites versus mobile apps for your mobile behavioral intervention: presenting four case studies
【24h】

Choosing between responsive-design websites versus mobile apps for your mobile behavioral intervention: presenting four case studies

机译:在响应式设计网站与移动应用程序之间进行选择,以进行移动行为干预:介绍四个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Both mobile apps and responsive-design websites (web apps) can be used to deliver mobile health (mHealth) interventions, but it can be difficult to discern which to use in research. The goal of this paper is to present four case studies from behavioral interventions that developed either a mobile app or a web app for research and present an information table to help researchers determine which mobile option would work best for them. Four behavioral intervention case studies (two developed a mobile app, and two developed a web app) presented include time, cost, and expertise. Considerations for adopting a mobile app or a web app-such as time, cost, access to programmers, data collection, security needs, and intervention components-are presented. Future studies will likely integrate both mobile app and web app modalities. The considerations presented here can help guide researchers on which platforms to choose prior to starting an mHealth intervention.
机译:移动应用程序和响应式设计网站(Web 应用程序)都可用于提供移动健康 (mHealth) 干预措施,但很难辨别在研究中使用哪种。本文的目的是介绍四个来自行为干预的案例研究,这些案例研究开发了用于研究的移动应用程序或网络应用程序,并提供了一个信息表,以帮助研究人员确定哪种移动选项最适合他们。介绍了四个行为干预案例研究(两个开发了一个移动应用程序,两个开发了一个网络应用程序),包括时间、成本和专业知识。介绍了采用移动应用程序或 Web 应用程序的注意事项,例如时间、成本、对程序员的访问、数据收集、安全需求和干预组件。未来的研究可能会整合移动应用程序和网络应用程序模式。这里介绍的注意事项可以帮助指导研究人员在开始移动医疗干预之前选择哪些平台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号