...
首页> 外文期刊>Mineral News >Splitters vs. Lumpers and their Influence on Species Creation
【24h】

Splitters vs. Lumpers and their Influence on Species Creation

机译:分流器与整块器及其对物种创造的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Albert Einstein's "General Theory of Relativity" published in 1916 forever made his name synonymous with "genius". Sadly, he spent a good part of the remainder of his life trying to integrate his gravitational theory with electromagnetic force, plus the strong and weak forces of the atom, into a single grand mathematical theory of everything, His failure to do this has similarly been the bane of physicists ever since. But rising in popularity over the past few years is "String Theory" (that suggests vibrating strings of energy, exceedingly smaller than the tiniest components of an atom are at the heart of all matter), indicating how far beyond pure science some science practitioners are willing to stray. "String Theory" does indeed allow a blueprint for a unified mathematical answer to existence, but it has one fatal flaw, and that flaw is substantial...it can never be proven!!! True, it can never be disproved either, so there are those who have good reason to relegate such an un-testable and thus un-provable theory as something other than science, perhaps a theory more akin to philosophy?
机译:爱因斯坦(Albert Einstein)于1916年出版的《相对论通论》(Fort of Relativity)永远使他的名字成为“天才”的代名词。可悲的是,他在余下的大部分时间中都试图将引力理论与电磁力以及原子的强力和弱势力整合为一个万物的单一数学理论,同样,他的失败也是自那时以来,物理学家的祸根。但是在过去的几年中,“弦论”的流行度不断提高(这表明振动的能量串,比所有原子的最小成分更小)是所有物质的核心),这表明某些科学从业者远远超出了纯粹的科学愿意流浪。 “弦论”确实确实为存在的统一数学答案提供了蓝图,但是它具有一个致命的缺陷,并且该缺陷是实质性的……永远无法证明!!!的确,它也永远不能被证明,因此,有一些人有充分的理由将这样一种无法检验且因此无法证明的理论作为科学以外的东西,也许是更类似于哲学的理论?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号