首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >PLANT OWNER CANNOT ESCAPE LIABILITY FOR COSTS AFTER ASSUMING OBLIGATIONS UNDER UNAMBIGUOUS AGREEMENT
【24h】

PLANT OWNER CANNOT ESCAPE LIABILITY FOR COSTS AFTER ASSUMING OBLIGATIONS UNDER UNAMBIGUOUS AGREEMENT

机译:根据不正确的协议承担义务后,植物所有者无法逃避赔偿责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Chisos Joint Venture I, 142 S.W.3d 447 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2004, no pet. h.), the court upheld summary judgment against Northern Natural Gas Co., a former natural gas purchaser, in favor of Chisos Joint Venture I, the owner of gas processed through a gas plant in Pecos County known as the Coyanosa Facility, and Duke Energy Field Services, Inc., the plant operator. The plant was owned and operated under a 1965 agreement among several gas producers in the area, including Miles Kimball Company, predecessor to the interest of Chisos. Kimball's gas was sold to Northern under a gas purchase contract that expired in 1991. In 1977 Kimball and Northern entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the PSA) under which Northern agreed to purchase Kimball's interest in the plant and assume Kimball's share of operating costs. After Kimball fulfilled its obligation to drill a well, which it also agreed to do under the PSA, Kimball delivered an assignment of its interest in the plant to Northern. For the next 18 years Northern paid its share of the plant's operating costs. In 1998, however, Northern refused to pay for its portion of a new compressor installation. In April 1999, Duke demanded that Northern pay 548,221.14 dollars and threatened to shut in Northern's share of gas processed through the plant. Northern claimed it had not actually acquired Kimball's interest in the plant and was not responsible for any of the costs. The gas Duke was threatening to shut in belonged to Chisos, so it filed suit against both Northern and Duke for a declaratory judgment establishing Northern's liability for plant costs. The trial court rendered summary judgment declaring Northern an owner of the plant responsible for its share of costs.
机译:在Northern Natural Gas Co.诉Chisos合营公司I,142 SW3d 447(Tex。App.-El Paso 2004,无宠物)中,法院维持了对Northern Natural Gas Co.(原天然气)的即席判决。买方是Chisos合资公司I的购买者,后者是通过位于Pecos县的一家名为Coyanosa设施的天然气厂处理的天然气的所有者,以及该工厂的运营商Duke Energy Field Services,Inc.。该厂是根据1965年协议在该地区的几家天然气生产商之间拥有和运营的,该公司包括Miles Kimball Company,这是Chisos的前身。根据1991年到期的天然气购买合同,Kimball的天然气被出售给Northern。1977年,Kimball与Northern签订了买卖协议(PSA),根据该协议,Northern同意购买Kimball在该工厂的权益并承担Kimball的运营成本份额。 。 Kimball履行了钻井义务(这也是PSA同意的义务)后,Kimball将其对该工厂的权益转让给了Northern。在接下来的18年中,Northern支付了工厂运营成本中的份额。但是,在1998年,北方航空拒绝为其新压缩机安装的部分付款。 1999年4月,杜克公司要求北方公司支付548,221.14美元,并威胁要关闭北方公司通过该厂处理的天然气的份额。北方航空公司声称实际上并未获得金博尔在该工厂的权益,也不对任何费用负责。天然气公爵威胁要关闭属于Chisos的汽油,因此它对Northern和Duke提起诉讼,要求作出声明性判决,确定Northern对工厂成本的责任。初审法院作出简易判决,宣布Northern为其责任分摊的工厂所有人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号