首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >Railroad Commission Need Not Address Traffic Safety in Considering Injection Well Permit
【24h】

Railroad Commission Need Not Address Traffic Safety in Considering Injection Well Permit

机译:铁路委员会在考虑注入井许可证时不必处理交通安全问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. (Pioneer) applied to the Texas Railroad Commission for a permit to convert a well in Wise County to an oil and gas waste disposal well, as required by Tex. Water Code § 27.031. The granting of such a permit is dependent on, among other things, the commission finding that the well is in the public interest. A group of residents living nearby opposed the proposed injection well, citing concerns about the well's environmental soundness and presenting arguments related to traffic safety. After a contested administrative hearing, at which Pioneer did not rebut the contestants' traffic-safety evidence but essentially argued only that the production of natural gas is in the public interest, the commission granted Pioneer's application. In Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future and Clean Water, No. 08-0497,2011 WL 836827 (Tex. Mar. 11,2011), the Texas Supreme Court reversed a court of appeals decision remanding the case to the commission to reconsider its decision using a broader definition of "public interest" that included public-safety concerns.
机译:先锋勘探有限公司(Pioneer)向德克萨斯州铁路委员会申请了许可证,根据德克萨斯州水法规§27.031的要求,该公司将怀斯县的一口井转换为油气废物处理井。授予这种许可证主要取决于委员会认为该井符合公共利益。一群居住在附近的居民反对该提议的注入井,理由是对该井的环境安全性表示担忧,并提出了与交通安全有关的论点。在一场有争议的行政听证会上,先锋没有反驳参赛者的交通安全证据,而实质上只是争辩说天然气的生产符合公共利益,该委员会批准了先锋的申请。在铁路委员会诉德州公民争取安全的未来和清洁水,第08-0497,2011号WL 836827(德克萨斯州,2011年3月11日)中,德州最高法院推翻了上诉法院将案件退还给委员会的裁决。使用包括公共安全问题在内的更广泛的“公共利益”定义来重新考虑其决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号