首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >Summary Judgment Evidence Held Inconclusive to Establish Whether Contract Company Man Had Authority to Bind Well Operator to Indemnify Service Provider
【24h】

Summary Judgment Evidence Held Inconclusive to Establish Whether Contract Company Man Had Authority to Bind Well Operator to Indemnify Service Provider

机译:尚无结论性总结证据,无法确定合同公司是否具有授权捆绑井运营商以补偿服务提供商的权力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Expro Americas, LLC v. Sanguine Gas Exploration, LLC, No. 14-10-00707-CV, 2011 WL 5098590 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 27, 2011, no pet. h.), addressed competing motions for summary judgment filed by Expro Americas, LLC (Expro), a contractor that had provided "choke flow services" in the drilling of a well, and Sanguine Gas Exploration, LLC (Sanguine), the well's operator, reversing the trial court's summary judgment for Sanguine.
机译:Expro Americas,LLC诉Sanguine Gas Exploration,LLC,第14-10-00707-CV号,2011年WL 5098590(德克萨斯州,休斯顿[第14区],德克萨斯州,2011年10月27日,无人陪审),解决了由承包商Propro Americas,LLC(Expro)提起的关于简要判决的竞争性议案,该承包商在钻井过程中提供了“节流服务”,而该井的运营商Sanguine Gas Exploration,LLC(Sanguine)则撤销了该审判。法院对Sanguine的简易判决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号