首页> 外文期刊>Mapan: Journal of Metrology Society of India >Evaluation of Laboratory Performance Through Interlaboratory Comparison
【24h】

Evaluation of Laboratory Performance Through Interlaboratory Comparison

机译:通过实验室间比较评估实验室绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper reports the performance of the calibration results obtained by 21 laboratories using digital pressure calibrator as an artifact in the pressure range 7-70 MPa. National Physical Laboratory (NPLI), New Delhi has coordinated this programme and also acted as a reference laboratory. The program started in May, 2006 and completed during May, 2008. The comparison was carried out at 10 equally spaced pressure points i.e. 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63 and 70 MPa throughout the entire pressure range of 7-70 MPa. The calibration results thus obtained were analyzed as per ISO/IEC GUM document. The 92.7percent measurement results are found in agreement with the results of NPLI. The relative deviations between laboratories values and reference values are well within the 0.05percent for 123 measurement points, 0.1percent for 162 measurement points and 0.25percent for 177 measurement points. The difference of the laboratories values with reference values are found almost well within the uncertainty band of the reference values at 68.0percent measurement results, within their reported expanded uncertainty band at 81.5percent measurement results and within the combined expanded measurement uncertainty band at 92.7percent measurement results. Overall, the results are considered to be reasonably good being the first proficiency testing for most of the participating laboratories.
机译:本文报告了21个实验室使用数字压力校准器作为伪像在7-70 MPa范围内获得的校准结果的性能。新德里的国家物理实验室(NPLI)协调了该计划,并充当了参考实验室。该程序于2006年5月开始,于2008年5月完成。在整个压力范围内的10个等间距压力点(即7、14、21、28、35、42、49、56、63和70 MPa)下进行了比较。范围为7-70 MPa。根据ISO / IEC GUM文件对由此获得的校准结果进行分析。发现92.7%的测量结果与NPLI的结果一致。实验室值与参考值之间的相对偏差在123个测量点的0.05%之内,162个测量点的0.1%和177个测量点的0.25%之内。实验室值与参考值之间的差异几乎可以在测量结果为68.0%的参考值的不确定度带内,在报告的测量结果为81.5%的扩展不确定度带和组合的扩展测量不确定性为92.7%的带内发现结果。总体而言,对于大多数参与实验室的首次能力验证,结果都被认为是相当不错的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号