...
首页> 外文期刊>Microsurgery. >Are mechanical microvascular anastomoses easier to learn than suture anastomoses?
【24h】

Are mechanical microvascular anastomoses easier to learn than suture anastomoses?

机译:机械微血管吻合术比缝合吻合术更容易学习吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sutured anastomoses of small vessels are considered difficult to learn. Mechanical anastomosis systems allow a more rapidly performed anastomosis. In order to compare the process of learning to perform sutured and mechanical microvascular anastomoses, two surgeons, with limited microvascular experience, performed 30 aortic and 30 femoral vein anastomoses in 30 Wistar rats. The methods compared were conventional suture, vascular closure system (VCS) and microvascular anastomatic coupler system (MAC). There were no inter-surgeon differences regarding patency or time to perform anastomoses. The average time to perform a suture anastomosis was 39 min (patency 80%). Anastomoses with the VCS system took 24 min (patency 25%), whereas the MAC couplers took 13 min to perform (patency 95%). There was a significant learning effect with sutures, but no obvious reduction in time to perform MAC coupler or VCS clip anastomoses was seen. MAC couplers were easiest to use, and allowed us to perform rapid anastomoses with high patency.
机译:小血管缝合的吻合被认为很难学习。机械吻合系统可实现更快的吻合。为了比较学习进行缝合和机械性微血管吻合的过程,两名微血管经验有限的外科医生在30只Wistar大鼠中进行了30次主动脉和30次股静脉吻合。比较的方法是常规缝合,血管闭合系统(VCS)和微血管吻合系统(MAC)。关于通畅性或进行吻合的时间,外科医生之间没有差异。进行缝合吻合术的平均时间为39分钟(通畅率为80%)。使用VCS系统进行吻合需要24分钟(通畅率为25%),而MAC耦合器需要13分钟才能执行(通畅率为95%)。缝线具有明显的学习效果,但未发现执行MAC耦合器或VCS夹吻合术的时间明显减少。 MAC耦合器最易于使用,并允许我们以高通畅度进行快速吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号