...
首页> 外文期刊>Midwifery >Unique and proforma birth plans: A qualitative exploration of midwives' experiences
【24h】

Unique and proforma birth plans: A qualitative exploration of midwives' experiences

机译:独特和备考的分娩计划:对助产士经历的定性探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: birth plans detailing a woman's preferences for intrapartum care are a common feature in British maternity units, and are a means of encouraging the implementation of choice. Proforma versions may be incorporated routinely in antenatal case notes, or the woman may devise her own unique birth plan. Although women's views of birth plans have been explored, the views of midwives have not to date been evaluated. The growth of midwife-led units in the UK has highlighted different philosophies of care, some of which can be reflected in the different types of birth plan. Given the increasingly diverse nature of UK midwifery workplaces we set out to explore and compare the experience of midwives working in midwife-led and obstetric-led settings in relation to unique and proforma birth plans. Method: qualitative study using focus groups of midwives in a midwife-led unit (MLU; n=5) and obstetric-led unit (OLU; n=4) in the East of England. We used an interpretative phenomenological analytical approach. Findings: three main themes arose from the data. Firstly, the term 'birth plan' can be misleading, and was criticised for encouraging the belief that birth can be 'planned'. In addition, midwives claimed that 'unique' birth plans, especially those influenced by some consumer advocacy groups, are becoming standardised in their rejection of policies and procedures and requests for intervention-free birth. Secondly, birth plans were a source of irritation for midwives in both groups, although the cause of the irritation differed between groups. Finally, it was found that midwives in both groups felt that birth plans put pressure on them, although again, the source of the pressure, and therefore the way in which midwives reacted to this pressure, differed between groups. Conclusions: the term 'birth plan' can be misleading and create false expectations. If 'unique' birth plans are becoming 'standardised' in the sense that they routinely request the same things, they are little different to proforma birth plans. Some midwives perceive pressure both from women and the wider multidisciplinary team as a result of birth plans, a perception that causes some irritation.
机译:背景:详细说明妇女对产时护理偏爱的生育计划是英国产科部门的共同特征,并且是鼓励实施选择的一种手段。形式形式可能会常规地纳入产前病例说明中,或者该妇女可能会设计自己的独特生育计划。尽管已经探讨了妇女对生育计划的看法,但迄今为止尚未评估助产士的看法。英国由助产士主导的单位的增长凸显了不同的护理理念,其中一些可以反映在不同类型的生育计划中。鉴于英国助产士工作场所的性质日益多样化,我们着手探讨和比较在助产士主导和产科主导环境中工作的助产士的经历与独特和备考的计划生育有关。方法:定性研究使用英格兰东部以助产士为主导的单位(MLU; n = 5)和以产科为主导的单位(OLU; n = 4)的助产士焦点小组。我们使用了一种解释现象学的分析方法。结果:数据产生了三个主要主题。首先,“生育计划”一词可能会引起误解,并因鼓励人们相信可以“计划生育”这一信念而受到批评。此外,助产士声称,“独特的”生育计划,特别是受某些消费者权益团体影响的计划,在拒绝政策和程序以及无干预生育的要求方面正变得标准化。其次,尽管两组之间的刺激原因不同,但生育计划是两组助产士的一种刺激源。最后,发现两组的助产士都认为生育计划给他们施加了压力,尽管压力的来源以及助产士对这种压力的反应方式在两组之间也有所不同。结论:“生育计划”一词可能会误导他人并产生错误的期望。如果“独特”的生育计划从常规上要求相同的意义上变得“标准化”,则它们与备考生育计划几乎没有什么不同。一些助产士由于计划生育而感到来自妇女和更大范围的多学科团队的压力,这种看法引起了一些不适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号