首页> 外文期刊>Innovation and Development >Conceptual distinction between agricultural innovation and rural innovation: implications for scientific research and public policy
【24h】

Conceptual distinction between agricultural innovation and rural innovation: implications for scientific research and public policy

机译:农业创新与农村创新的概念区别:对科学研究和公共政策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Rural areas require better living conditions and revitalization. Consequently, innovation in the countryside needs to be discussed. The work proposes a conceptual framework to distinguish agricultural innovation (AI) and rural innovation (RI) as contrasting approaches. We examine for both approaches in scientific research trends (2014-2018) and public policies for the Mexican countryside (2013-2018). While AI has strong conceptual development focusing on technology, agri-businesses, and competitiveness of farming systems, RI is an under-construction approach looking for rural change considering endogenous development and social innovations. Recent research trends were aligned to both approaches but also to innovation for facing climate change (ICC). Mexican public policy only reflected the AI approach despite the high marginalization in rural territories. AI, RI, and ICC are different conceptual fields but strongly related to sustainable rural development. Distinguishing AI and RI contributes to clarifying scientific research and designing appropriate public policies, considering inequalities in the rural world.
机译:农村地区需要更好的生活条件和振兴。因此,需要讨论农村的创新。这项工作提出了一个概念框架,以区分农业创新(AI)和农村创新(RI)作为对比方法。我们研究了科学研究趋势(2014-2018)和墨西哥农村公共政策(2013-2018)的两种方法。虽然人工智能在技术、农业综合企业和农业系统的竞争力方面具有很强的概念发展,但 RI 是一种正在考虑内生发展和社会创新的农村变革的建设中方法。最近的研究趋势与这两种方法相一致,但也与应对气候变化(ICC)的创新相一致。尽管农村地区高度边缘化,但墨西哥的公共政策仅反映了人工智能方法。人工智能、区域性发展和国际通信中心是不同的概念领域,但与可持续农村发展密切相关。区分人工智能和创新机构有助于澄清科学研究和制定适当的公共政策,同时考虑到农村世界的不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号