首页> 外文期刊>Cancer causes and control: CCC >Can we trust cancer information on the Internet?--A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites.
【24h】

Can we trust cancer information on the Internet?--A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites.

机译:我们可以信任互联网上的癌症信息吗?-交互式癌症风险站点的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and quality of interactive cancer risk sites on the Internet. METHODS: A cancer risk site was defined as a website that gave an estimate of the individual risk of developing cancer. Six search engines and one Meta crawler were used to search the Internet for cancer risk sites (including breast, prostate, colon, and lung cancer). A set of defined quality criteria for health related websites was used to evaluate the websites during 2001 and 2002. RESULTS: The number of cancer risk sites, as defined above, increased by 50% between 2001 and 2002. Only two out of 22 cancer risk sites fulfilled the quality criteria adequately. No signs of a change in trend (with regard to the quality criteria met) were noted in January 2005. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of the documentation on the cancer risk sites was poor and no improvement was seen during the study period. The majority of the cancer risk sites do not give reliable risk estimates.
机译:目的:调查互联网上交互式癌症风险站点的流行程度和质量。方法:将癌症风险网站定义为一个网站,该网站可以估算出患癌症的个人风险。使用六个搜索引擎和一个Meta搜寻器在Internet上搜索癌症风险站点(包括乳腺癌,前列腺癌,结肠癌和肺癌)。在2001年至2002年期间,使用了一套针对健康相关网站的已定义质量标准对网站进行了评估。结果:如上所述,在2001年至2002年之间,癌症风险站点的数量增加了50%。在22个癌症风险中,只有两个站点充分满足质量标准。在2005年1月,没有注意到趋势变化的迹象(符合所达到的质量标准)。结论:关于癌症风险部位的文档的整体质量较差,在研究期间未见改善。大多数癌症风险部位没有给出可靠的风险估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号