【24h】

Revisiting absolute gravimeter intercomparisons

机译:回顾绝对重力仪的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An absolute gravimeter allows us to determine the local value of gravity, which makes its accuracy assessment challenging. The instrumental offsets are classically estimated by performing comparisons of the results obtained by a set of instruments measuring at the same location but at different epochs (measuring at the same place and epoch is physically impossible). Such intercomparison campaigns have been done a few times since 1980. In this paper, we discuss the method of data processing used for those comparisons. We demonstrate that one of the methods used is inadequate, as it underestimates the dispersion of the instrumental offsets, which is the only reliable quantity that can be obtained from such a comparison. We also propose a new criterion, based on the minimization of the L1 norm of the offsets, for fixing the constant of the ill-conditioned problem, which we show to be statistically more precise than the one classically used.
机译:绝对重力仪使我们能够确定重力的局部值,这使其精度评估具有挑战性。传统上,通过对在同一位置但在不同时期测量的一组仪器获得的结果进行比较来估计仪器的偏移量(在物理上不可能在同一位置和时期进行测量)。自1980年以来,这种比对活动已经进行了几次。在本文中,我们讨论了用于这些比较的数据处理方法。我们证明所使用的方法之一是不充分的,因为它低估了仪器偏移的离散度,这是可以从这种比较中获得的唯一可靠量。我们还基于偏移的L1范数的最小化提出了一个新标准,用于固定病态问题的常数,从统计学上讲,它比传统上使用的更精确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号