首页> 外文期刊>Biology & philosophy >The arts and human nature: Evolutionary aesthetics and the evolutionary status of art behaviours: Stephen Davies: The artful species: Aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012
【24h】

The arts and human nature: Evolutionary aesthetics and the evolutionary status of art behaviours: Stephen Davies: The artful species: Aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012

机译:艺术与人性:进化美学和艺术行为的进化状态:斯蒂芬·戴维斯:狡猾的物种:美学,艺术与进化。牛津大学出版社,牛津,2012年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay reviews one of the most recent books in a trend of new publications proffering evolutionary theorising about aesthetics and the arts-themes within an increasing literature on aspects of human life and human nature in terms of evolutionary theory. Stephen Davies' The Artful Species links some of our aesthetic sensibilities with our evolved human nature and critically surveys the interdisciplinary debate regarding the evolutionary status of the arts. Davies' engaging and accessible writing succeeds in demonstrating the maturity and scope of the field and his critique is timely and unparalleled. A laudable effort, however it may have benefited from espousing a co-evolutionary model more explicitly. Moreover there may be reason to question the usefulness of the standard set of distinctions ('adaptation', 'spandrel', 'technology') that Davies appeals to.
机译:本文回顾了越来越多的有关进化论的关于人类生活和人性方面的文献中出现的关于美学和艺术主题的进化理论的新出版物趋势中的最新书籍之一。斯蒂芬·戴维斯(Stephen Davies)的《狡猾的物种》将我们的某些审美敏感性与我们进化后的人性联系在一起,并批判性地考察了关于艺术发展状况的跨学科辩论。戴维斯引人入胜且易于理解的著作成功地证明了该领域的成熟度和范围,他的评论是及时而无与伦比的。值得称赞的努力,然而,它可能得益于更明确地拥护共同进化模型。此外,也许有理由质疑戴维斯所呼吁的标准区分标准(“适应”,“蓝领”,“技术”)的用处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号