首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >A comparison of sedation protocols for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: moderate sedation with analgesic supplementation vs analgesia targeted light sedation
【24h】

A comparison of sedation protocols for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: moderate sedation with analgesic supplementation vs analgesia targeted light sedation

机译:胃内镜下黏膜下剥离镇静方案的比较:中度镇痛加镇痛剂与镇痛靶向轻度镇静剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Moderate to deep sedation has been recommended during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is often accompanied by adverse events such as respiratory depression or aspiration pneumonia. This study investigated the respiratory complications and ESD outcomes of two sedation protocols: moderate sedation with analgesic supplementation (MSAS) and analgesia targeted light sedation (AILS).
机译:背景。在内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)期间,建议进行中度至深度镇静。然而,它通常伴随着诸如呼吸抑制或吸入性肺炎之类的不良事件。这项研究调查了两种镇静方案的呼吸道并发症和ESD结果:中度镇痛镇痛补充剂(MSAS)和镇痛靶向轻度镇静剂(AILS)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号