首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Combined adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
【24h】

Combined adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

机译:全膝关节置换术后联合使用内收管阻滞与关节周围浸润对比关节周围浸润进行镇痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and periarticular infiltration (PI) have been shown to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without the motor blockade. However, the efficacy and safety of combined ACB with PI (ACB+PI) as compared to PI alone for analgesia after TKA remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of ACB+PI with PI alone on pain controll after TKA.
机译:背景:内收管阻滞(ACB)和关节周围浸润(PI)已显示可减轻全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的疼痛,而无运动阻滞。但是,与单独使用PI相比,将ACB与PI组合使用(ACB + PI)进行TKA镇痛的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,比较了ACB + PI和PI单独治疗TKA后疼痛的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号