...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, health care, and philosophy >Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics
【24h】

Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics

机译:同伴利益是否足以证明对能力不强的个人进行研究?研究伦理守则中的同一人口条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research on incompetent humans raises ethical challenges, especially when there is no direct benefit to these research subjects. Contemporary codes of research ethics typically require that such research must specifically serve to benefit the population to which the research subjects belong. The article critically examines this "same-population condition", raising issues of both interpretation and moral justification. Of particular concern is the risk that the way in which the condition is articulated and rationalized in effect disguises or downplays the instrumentalization of incompetent individuals.
机译:对不称职的人类进行的研究提出了道德挑战,尤其是在没有直接受益于这些研究主题的情况下。当代研究道德规范通常要求此类研究必须专门用于使研究对象所属的人群受益。这篇文章批判性地研究了这种“人口相同的条件”,提出了解释和道德辩护的问题。特别令人担忧的是,这种状况的表达和合理化实际上掩盖或低估了不称职的个人的工具化的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号