...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >What Is the Most Accurate Method for the Treatment of Diminutive Colonic Polyps? Standard Versus Jumbo Forceps Polypectomy
【24h】

What Is the Most Accurate Method for the Treatment of Diminutive Colonic Polyps? Standard Versus Jumbo Forceps Polypectomy

机译:治疗小肠结肠息肉最准确的方法是什么?标准对大钳息肉切除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Different methods such as standard, hot, and jumbo forceps are used in endoscopic treatment of diminutive colon polyps. In the current study, it was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods in treatment of diminutive colon polyps of <= 5 mm. Polyps with <= 5 mm which were excised during colonoscopy by using standard or jumbo forceps were evaluated. Standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods were randomly performed in 212 consecutive patients with diminutive colorectal polyp. One-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were also determined among polypectomy methods. Results of 161 standard forceps polypectomy and 102 jumbo forceps polypectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Both one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were significantly higher in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group than the standard forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis performed according to polyp sizes, complete resection rate among polyps with 3-mm diameter was determined as 100%. However, numbers of bites in 4-mm and 5-mm polyps were higher in the standard forceps polypectomy group, and complete resection rate was lower than in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). Both endoscopic treatment methods may be employed in treatment of diminutive colon polyps with <= 5 mm. However, jumbo forceps polypectomy is a more effective treatment method in 4- to 5-mm polyps with high one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rate.
机译:内镜治疗小肠结肠息肉时使用了不同的方法,例如标准钳,热钳和巨型钳。在当前的研究中,目的是比较标准钳和巨型钳息肉切除术治疗小于等于5 mm的小结肠息肉的疗效和安全性。评估在结肠镜检查中通过使用标准或巨型钳切除的小于等于5 mm的息肉。 212名连续性大肠息肉缩小患者随机接受标准和巨型镊子息肉切除术。息肉切除术方法中还确定了一口息肉切除术和完全切除率。回顾性分析161例标准钳息肉切除术和102例巨型钳息肉切除术的结果。巨型镊子息肉切除术组的一口息肉切除术和完全切除率均显着高于标准镊子息肉切除术组(P <0.001)。在根据息肉大小进行的亚组分析中,直径3 mm的息肉完全切除率为100%。然而,标准钳息肉切除术组中4-mm和5-mm息肉的叮咬次数更高,并且完全切除率低于巨型钳息肉切除术组(P <0.001)。两种内窥镜治疗方法均可用于治疗<= 5 mm的小结肠息肉。但是,对于高位一口息肉切除术和完全切除率较高的4至5毫米息肉,巨型钳息肉切除术是一种更有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号