首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation.
【24h】

Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation.

机译:多叶准直器场分割算法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the "stop and shoot" method of intensity modulated radiation therapy, it is desirable to use an efficient multileaf collimator (MLC) field segmentation algorithm in the sense that it translates beam intensity maps into the least number of MLC field segments. In this work, we compare the performance of eight different algorithms, including the ones by Bortfeld et al., Galvin et al., Xia and Verhey, the Siemens IMFAST algorithm, and four other algorithms which have not been studied before. We find that the algorithm of Xia and Verhey is most frequently the algorithm that needs the least MLC field segments. However, no single algorithm is the most efficient for all clinical cases or intensity maps. This suggests that it is desirable to have multiple algorithms available in a clinical treatment planning system which will search through all algorithms automatically and find the most efficient delivery sequence for a given treatment. Each intensity map in a treatment could be delivered by a different algorithm, whichever is the most efficient for that map. It is pointed out that when the background intensity level is not zero, it is not always efficient to deliver a segment to bring the background level down to zero.
机译:在强度调制放射疗法的“停下来射击”方法中,期望使用有效的多叶准直器(MLC)场分割算法,因为它将光束强度图转换成最少数量的MLC场段。在这项工作中,我们比较了八种不同算法的性能,包括Bortfeld等人,Galvin等人,Xia和Verhey的算法,西门子IMFAST算法以及之前未研究过的其他四种算法。我们发现Xia和Verhey的算法是最需要最少MLC字段分段的算法。但是,对于所有临床病例或强度图,没有一种算法是最有效的。这表明希望在临床治疗计划系统中具有多种可用算法,这些算法将自动搜索所有算法并找到给定治疗的最有效递送顺序。治疗中的每个强度图都可以通过不同的算法传递,以哪种算法最有效。要指出的是,当背景强度水平不为零时,传递分段以使背景水平降至零并不总是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号