...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine and law >Coercion in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: clinical, ethical and legal implications.
【24h】

Coercion in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: clinical, ethical and legal implications.

机译:强制治疗神经性厌食症:临床,伦理和法律意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Because of its high mortality and treatment resistence, clinicians sometimes invoke the law in aid of retaining their most acutely ill-patients in treatment or re-feeding programs. Depending on the jurisdiction, various laws, including mental health and adult guardianship laws, have been invoked to achieve this objective (Carney, Tait, Saunders, Touyz & Beumont, 2003). Until recently, little was known about the therapeutic impact of coercion on patients (Saunders, 2001, Carney & Saunders 2003), or the relative advantages of different avenues of coercion (Carney, Saunders, Tait, Touyz & Ingvarson 2004). Most obscure of all, however, has been our understanding of the factors influencing clinical decisions within specialist anorexia treatment units regarding which in-patients will be selected for coerced treatment. This paper reports legal and ethical implications of findings from analysis of data gathered from a major Australian specialist anorexia treatment facility over nearly 5 years.
机译:由于其高死亡率和对治疗的抵抗力,临床医生有时会援引法律,以帮助将病情最严重的患者留在治疗或再喂养计划中。根据不同的司法管辖区,为了实现这一目标,已引用了各种法律,包括精神健康和成人监护法(Carney,Tait,Saunders,Touyz&Beumont,2003年)。直到最近,人们对胁迫对患者的治疗效果(Saunders,2001; Carney&Saunders 2003)或不同途径的相对优势(Carney,Saunders,Tait,Touyz和Ingvarson 2004)知之甚少。然而,最令人费解的是我们对影响专业厌食症治疗单位内临床决策的因素的理解,有关这些因素将选择住院治疗的患者。本文报告了近5年从澳大利亚一家主要的专业厌食症治疗机构收集到的数据进行分析得出的结论的法律和道德意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号