首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Testing non-cognitive attributes in selection centres: How to avoid being reliably wrong
【24h】

Testing non-cognitive attributes in selection centres: How to avoid being reliably wrong

机译:在选择中心测试非认知属性:如何避免可靠地错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this issue, Gafni et al. provide a strong and timely case for evaluating the reliability and validity of multi-station selection centres (SCs, sometimes referred to as assessment centres). In developing this important research topic, we highlight: (i) important differences between SCs and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs); (ii) the importance of demonstrating the construct validity of selection methods, and (iii) psychometric issues surrounding the reliability of observer ratings and the use of generalisability theory (G theory).
机译:在这个问题上,Gafni等人。为评估多站点选择中心(SC,有时称为评估中心)的可靠性和有效性提供了有力且及时的案例。在发展这一重要的研究主题时,我们强调:(i)SC与客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)之间的重要区别; (ii)证明选择方法的结构有效性的重要性,以及(iii)围绕观察者等级的可靠性和泛化理论(G理论)的使用的心理计量学问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号